HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-1091
2
3
4i
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-109
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO RATIFYING THE SUBMISSION OF AN ABC GRANTS PROPOSAL FOR
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE CONTROL AND AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID GRANT
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $50,000.00.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby
ratify the submission of an ABC Grants Proposal for Local Law Enforcement from the State
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and authorize the acceptance of said grant funds in the
amount of approximately $50,000.00. The grant application outlining the police department's
participation is attached.
1
2004-109
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17'
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO RATIFYING THE SUBMISSION OF AN ABC GRANTS PROPOSAL FOR
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE CONTROL AND AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF SAID GRANT
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF APPROXIMATELY $50,000.00.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a it. regular meeting thereof, held
on the 19th day of April 2004, by the following vote, to wit:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA x
LONGVILLE x
MCGINNIS x
DERRY x
KELLEY x
JOHNSON x
MCCAMMACK x
CITY CLERK
The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this 21 ST day of April 2004.
Approved as to
Form and legal content:
JAh
City
LN
2
2004-109
GRANT ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES PROJECT
GRANT FORMS
C A L I! O R N l A
7=
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
State of California
SUNNE WRIGHT-MCPEAK, Secretary
Business, Transportation and Housing Agency
JERRY R. JOLLY, Acting Director
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
2004-109
° State of California
0
O 1fDepartment of Alcoholic Beverage Control
Grant Assistance to Local Law Enforcement Agencies Project
PROPOSAL COVER SHEET
(TOBECOMPLETEDBYAPPLICANTAGENCY)
1. Name of Applicant Agency: ABC Control # (ABC use only)
San Bernardino Police Department
2. Description of Applicant Agency: (Provide a brief summary including history, size, staffing and
structure of the organization in no more than 100 words.)
The San Bernardino Police Department consists of 453 personnel, including 158 non sworn and 295 sworn
personnel. The department has adopted Community Policing and Problems Solving, (COPPS) as a department
wide policing strategy, that utilizes 5 district areas to provide services to the citizens.
3. City or County Served:
4. Population of Service Area:
San Bernardino
186,410
5. Project Description: (Summarize the proposed project plan covering the objectives, method of
procedure, evaluation, and end product in approximately 100 words.)
The project plan will attack the problem of underage drinking from both an educational and enforcement
angle. The investigators will use several methods of enforcement along with ABC officers to reduce the
problem of underage drinking and the associated crimes. The programs will be closely monitored so we can
adjust our tactics as needed to achieve the most effective results.
6. Funds Requested:
7. Project Period:
$50,000.00
Fiscal year 2004/2005
8. Acceptance of Conditions: By submitting this proposal, the applicant signifies acceptance of the
responsibility to comply with all requirements stated in the Request for Proposals. The applicant
understands that ABC is not obligated to fund the project until the applicant submits correctly
completed documents required for the contract.
A. PROJECT DIRECTOR (person having
B. CHIEF OF POLICE OR SHERIFF
day-to-day res o sibility for theproject)
(authorizing official)
Name: Jeff Breiten
Name: Garrett W. Zimmon
Address: 710 N. "D" St. San Bernardino, CA 92401
Address: 710 N. "D" St. San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: (909)384-5742
Phone: (909)384-5600
Fax:
Fax:
E. Mail Addre
E. Mail Address.
Signature:
Signature:
Title: Police to enant
Title: Police Chief
C. FISCAL OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL
D. ABC USE ONLY
Name: Barbara Pachon
Address: 300 N. "D" St. San Bernardino, CA 92401
Phone: (909)384-5242
Fax:
E. Mail Addres '
Signature:
Title: Finance Director
ABC-800-A (1 /03)
2004-109
PROJECT NARRATIVE
(Maximum 8 pages. Font size no smaller than 12point.)
BACKGROUND
The City of San Bernardino is the county seat in San Bernardino County. San Bernardino is at the base of the
San Bernardino National Forest and the neighboring cities include; Highland, Loma Linda, Rialto, Colton and
Devore. Interstate freeways I-215 and I-10 provide travel through our city. We are home to California State
University San Bernardino where more than 15,000 students are enrolled. There are approximately 347 ABC
licensed premises in San Bernardino for residents and non-residents to access alcoholic beverages.
The agency has the responsibility to provide police service to a wide range of citizenry including a large
population in the lower socio-economic bracket. The city encompasses 60 square mile with an estimated
population 185,401. According to the United States economic forecast, the Inland Empire, which incorporates
the city, is one of the top ten growth areas in the nation with the fastest developing urban area. Located 60
miles east of Los Angeles, it is one hour driving time from popular children attractions, mountain resorts, the
high desert, and beaches.
The city is ethnically diverse with 36% of the population of Anglo descent, 16% African American, 5%
Asian, and 43% Hispanic. In addition recent analysis has shown that approximately 31 % of the city's
population is under the age of 18. The San Bernardino Police Department consists of 453 personnel, including
158 non sworn and 295 sworn personnel. The department has adopted Community Policing and Problems
Solving, (COPPS) as a department wide policing strategy. In 1998 the department was the recipient of the
governors award for organizational achievement for training excellence in the area of community policing.
Currently we have a dedicated two person Vice unit with their direct supervision coming under a sergeant. In
addition to the enforcement of ABC related activities, this unit is responsible for the enforcement of all vice
related crimes to include street level prostitution, escorts, motel prostitution, massage parlors, gaming and
carnivals, gambling, animal fighting, lewd act investigations in the parks, and the adult book stores. They
also work directly with city hall, particularly the Business Registration Department and the Planning
Department.
The project will fall under the direct supervision of the vice unit and they will be responsible for the
implementation of the project and for the continuous monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the
project. They will complete all necessary progress reports required of the grant.
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The primary problem as identified by the Vice officers is the increased drain on police services as a result of
underage drinking at the ABC licensed locations. The secondary problem is the associated crimes of drinking
in public, public intoxication, intoxicated patrons fighting in the parking lots and general quality of life issues
for the businesses and residences that are closely located to the licensed location. The use of scarce police
services to deal with these crimes impacts our ability to respond to serious and/or violent felony crimes. The
City of San Bernardino has had an increase in the reported crime rate, as have most of the cities throughout
the state. This coupled with the low socio-economic citizens, and the over 15,000 students enrolled at Cal
State University San Bernardino, challenges our abilities to safely provide for the safety of all city residents.
There are over 340 ABC licensed establishments and only two vice officers to monitor their compliance.
Among the most problematic are several large night club type establishments that draw under age patrons
from as far away as San Diego to the south and Los Angeles to the west. Often times businesses that are
located close to the licensed establishments suffer economically as they are forced to close when the patrons
of the establishments loiter and prevent them from carrying on the normal operations.
ABC-800-B (1 /03)
2004-109
Both the local City Attorney, who handles the various municipal code violations, and the District Attorneys
office, who prosecute the state law violations are actively, aggressively involved in the successful prosecution
of the criminal offenses and also any prevention efforts that we can employ. Obviously the prevention efforts
are preferred as this will reduce the drain of their limited resources.
Currently with only two officers assigned to full time investigatory responsibilities and the large amount of
physical locations it is very difficult to adequately ensure proper compliance with all applicable ABC laws, as
well as local statutes. The officers have done a tremendous job in the past year with prior grant funding from
the state. They were able to increase the amount of programs over 200% with the prior funding. To date this
has resulted in approximately 193 arrests and citations for various alcohol related crimes. Prior to the
increased overtime the two officers did not have enough time to adequately investigate complaints, or take
any proactive, preventive actions.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
Through past experience it has been found that a two prong attack on the problem has been effective. The first
step is a proactive educational effort directed at the ABC establishments who through their location or past
history have a high likelihood of underage patrons trying to purchase or use alcohol. Educational efforts are
also directed at the underage population that may try to purchase alcohol. This is accomplished through a
working relationship with the officials at Cal State University San Bernardino and San Bernardino Valley
College. We will also continue our participation in the Cal State University Partnership program.
By doing on site visits with the owners/operators and providing them with the necessary information to help
their employees identify underage patrons and take the appropriate steps to eliminate that activity we can
reduce the enforcement efforts. A secondary benefit from the educational efforts is the development of a
partnership with the establishment. This helps to open the lines of communication and to encourage the rapid
exchange of timely information.
The second step in attacking the problem is the use of decoy programs to target the offenders themselves.
Several of the methods that have been use successfully in the past and will continue to be aggressively
pursued is the "shoulder tap" method of undercover operatives trying to have others purchase the alcohol for
them and also the "decoy" program where underage operatives try to purchase the alcohol themselves. We
have also worked with ABC personnel in identifying the use of false or fraudulent identification at licensed
establishments.
The laptop computer will be used in both the preventative and enforcement parts of our attack. The vast
amount of information available through both the state and other resources can be presented in a Power Point
format to groups or individuals. The portability of the unit will allow for real time tracking of statistical
information and will be used to store photo documentation for both judicial and administrative proceedings.
METHOD OF PROCEDURE
The grant funds would allow the San Bernardino Police Department to continue to have a definite impact on
the identified problems. We will continue to work cooperatively with ABC investigators from the Riverside
office. We will continue to strategize our efforts to provide education and prevention programs to the public
and the licensees, and we will conduct enforcement at ABC licensed premises.
ABC-800-B (1 /03)
2004-109
programs will consist of 1) Decoy Programs, 2) Shoulder Tap Programs, 3) IMPACT Programs, 4) Trap
r Programs, and 5) Cops in Shops Programs. We will continue to have Task Force Operations and we
Id schedule two LEAD Training sessions. One goal would be to conduct programs in trouble spots where
sting people are necessary, and meet with the licensee(s) and/or management to resolve the problems.
)uraging compliance with the ABC rules and regulations would be achieved by involving them in solving
hol-related problems. For example, a nightclub owner that is having trouble with minors using fake ID's
Id allow us to conduct a Trap Door program. The grant funds will allow the San Bernardino Police
artment to conduct these programs on a weekly rather than a monthly basis to ensure that both the
blishments and the patrons are aware of the close monitoring by the department and to continue to
itain a presence at the college and university.
vice officers that are currently assigned have years of experience in the identification of violations and
a very good working relationship with the local ABC officials. They are highly proactive and realize that
igh their hard work and efforts that a high quality of life can be established and maintained in the city.
METHOD OF EVALUATION
As with any enforcement efforts the ultimate goal is the reduction of the violations. The Vice officers have
been closely monitoring their past efforts and in fact have been providing monthly reports on the last grant
funding we received. Statistics are checked weekly and measured against prior years to see if the
enforcements efforts have been successful. The officers also check citywide crime patterns and trends to see if
the ancillary crimes that tend to follow the underage drinking are being reduced by their efforts.
This regular examination allows them to focus the resources on the locations that have the highest incidence
of violations, so that we can get the most impact from our limited resources. The San Bernardino Police
Department has a 5 person Crime Analysis unit that supports the vice unit in identifying possible target
establishments. This unit uses the ArcView software system, and has the resources of ESRI systems to
prepare comprehensive visual analysis of the data which the vice officers use to target problem locations.
LIASON
San Bernardino Police Department is currently working closely with investigators from the Riverside
: office under the grant for California State University Partnership. Prior to the grant funding our officers
doped and maintained a close working relationship with the ABC investigators. With the large volume of
ised locations in our city and the problems we have experienced with them, these close ties have been
;mely beneficial to both organizations, and will continue. The grant funds will allow to the San
iardino Police Department to continue with this close working relationship and ultimately allow a
essful use of the grants funds.
ATEMENT OF INTENT
nderage drinking and the types of crimes that follow from it have been and will continue to be a high
iority for the San Bernardino Police Department. We have had great success so far in our partnership with
BC and the department is committed to maintaining this relationship in the future.
ABC-800-B (1 /03)
2004-109
BUDGET ESTIMATE
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE -ITEM DETAIL
COST
(Round all budget amounts to
nearest dollar)
A. Personnel Services (salaries, overtime, and benefits)
Overtime for investigative personnel:
Est. 204 hrs. for P-3 @ $63.88 per hour
Est. 204 hrs. for P-2 @ $56.10 per hour
Est. 408 hrs. for P-I @ $48.18 per hour
$45,000.00
TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES
$45,000.00
B. Operating Expenses (maximum $2,500)
None
$0
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
$0.00
C. Equipment (maximum $2,500)
1 Laptop Computer with all software licenses
$2,500.00
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
$2,500.00
D. Travel Expense/Registration Fees (maximum $2,500)
Two (2) annual Grant Assistence Program conferences for two (2) investigators
$2,500.00
TOTAL TRAVEL EXPENSE
$2,500.00
TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE, ALL CATEGORIES
$50,000.00
ABC-800-C (t/03)
2004-109
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES
Complete the following to report the total funds available to support the activities related to
accomplishing the goals and objectives of the contract. In the "Grant Funds" column, report the
ABC funds requested by category. In the "Other Funds" column, report all other funds available
to support the project by category. Then calculate the totals by category in the "Program Total"
column. Total each column down to arrive at the total program funds available. (Round all
budget amounts to the nearest dollar.)
BUDGET CATEGORY
GRANT
OTHER
PROGRAM
FUNDS
FUNDS
TOTAL
Personnel Services
$45,000.00
$0.00
$45,000.00
Operating Expenses
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Travel/Registration Fees
$2,500.00
$0.00
$2,500.00
Equipment
$2,500.00
$0.00
$2,500.00
TOTALS
$50,000.00
$0.00
$50,000.00
(This form does not become part of the contract.)
ABC-800-D (1 /03)
2004-109
RATER #
CONTROL#
RATING FORM
rA1rFcnuv MAXTMUMMINTS POINTS RECEIVED
1.
Background
20
2.
Problem Statement
50
3.
Project
Objectives
65
4.
Method of Procedure
45
5,
Method of Evaluation
20
6.
ABC Liaison
25
7.
Statement of Intent
20
8.
Budget
30
MAXIMUM POSSIBLE: 275 Subtotal
Deductions
Net points
Each of the above categories contain questions assigned a point value. The point scale is
divided into five (5) columns labeled I, II, III, IV and V. Each question is evaluated
on the following criteria:
I. Does not respond to the question or was left blank.
II. Does not completely respond to the question. Information presented does not
provide a good understanding of applicant's intent, does not give detailed
information requested by the RFP, or does not adequately support the proposal.
III. Responsive to the question. Provides an average understanding of the applicant's
response to the RFP. Response adequately supports the proposal.
IV. Provides a response which gives a clear and detailed understanding of the
applicant's intent. Response presented a persuasive argument supporting the
proposal.
V. Outstanding response with clear, detailed and relevant information exceeding the
information requested. Response presented a compelling argument supporting
the proposal.
RATINGFORM-1
2004-109
TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE
The following items are rated on a present/not present basis. If the item is present there
are no additional points allowed. If the item is absent, a five (5) point deduction from
the applicant's total score will be taken.
YES
NO
l . Are all required forms completed?
If no, which form is missing?
2. Is each section completed? It is not
acceptable to reference another
section.
0
171
3. Is the proposal typewritten or
computer -generated with characters
no smaller than the equivalent of
standard 12 pitch print and printed
on paper that does not exceed 8-1/2
by 11 inches?
4. Is the narrative provided within
the maximum of eight (8) pages
and is it printed on the single
side of each page?
171
0
5. Is the proposal free of non -
required additional pages?
0
171
6. Is there one (1) original plus
four (4) copies of the grant proposal?
7. Is there one (1) signed (original
signature) of the Proposal
Cover Sheet?
171
0
8. Are copies assembled separately,
fastened in the upper left corner,
and unbound?
POINT DEDUCTION TOTAL 171
RATING FORM-2
2004-109
BACKGROUND (Maximum 20 points)
1=
II
III 1
IV
V
How clearly does the proposal
describe the qualifications of the
0
3
5
%
10
implementing agency, including
history, size, structure, etc.?
How well does the proposal discuss
the primary mission, range and focus
0
2
3
4
5
of services of the implementing
agency?
How well does the proposal
describe the project staffing,
0
2
3
4
5
supervision and evaluation
responsibilities?
SUBTOTAL
RATING FORM-3
2004-109
PROBLEM STATEMENT (Maximum 50 points)
I
II
III
IV
V
How well does the problem statement
describe the service area, including
0
3
5
7
10
geographic, economic composition,
significant social and crime factors?
How well does the problem statement
define the problematic ABC licensed
0
2
3
4
5
establishments within the service
area?
How well does the problem statement
describe the prosecution policy of the
0
3
5
7
10
local city attorney/district attorney
with regard to illegal purchases of
alcoholic beverages as well as illegal
sales of alcoholic beverages?
How well does the statement discuss
the need for the project and why
0
2
3
4
10
current resources are not meeting this
need?
How clearly does the statement
define the factors contributing to the
0
2
3
4
5
problem?
How clearly does the statement
define the factors affected by the
0
2
3
4
5
problem?
How well does the statement discuss
the attempts to solve the problem?
0
2
3
4
5
SUBTOTAL
RATINGFORM-4
2004-109
PROJECT OBJECTIVES (Maximum 65 points)
I
II
III
IV
V
How completely do the objectives
address the specific problems as
0
3
5
%
10
discussed in the Problem Statement?
How well does the applicant
incorporate the objectives given for
0
5
10
15
20
the specific target area?
How well are the objectives stated in
quantifiable terms (either in
0
3
5
%
10
percentages or whole numbers)?
How clearly do the stated objectives
address the implementation of a
0
5
7
10
15
comprehensive ABC program?
How committed is the applicant to
utilizing enforcement strategies that
0
3
5
7
10
target the illegal purchasing of
alcoholic beverages as well as the
illegal selling of alcoholic beverages?
SUBTOTAL
RATING FORM-5
2004-109
METHOD OF PROCEDURE (Maximum 45 points)
I
II
III
IV
V
How clearly do the activities
correspond to the objectives?
0
2
3
4
5
How well are the activities designed
to achieve the objectives?
0
5
7
10
15
How well does the application
provide time frames for anticipated
0
3
5
7
10
completion of each phase?
How appropriate is the staff assigned
to the project and do the staff
0
3
5
7
10
assignments tie to the services and
objectives?
How well do the activities describe
the staff qualifications?
0
2
3
4
5
SUBTOTAL
METHOD OF EVALUATION
How completely does the application
describe the evaluation plan?
(Maximum 20 points)
I I II I III
0 1 5 110 115 120
SUBTOT
RATING FORM-6
2004-109
ABC LIAISON (Maximum 25 points)
=
II
III
IV
V
How clearly does the applicant
describe their current or past
0
5
7
10
15
experience with ABC?
How well does the applicant apply
past experience with ABC to future
0
3
5
7
10
success of the grant project?
SUBTOTAL
STATEMENT OF INTENT (Maximum 20 points)
I 1 II Jill
How clearly does the applicant define
their intent to continue using the 0 ( 10
resources developed by the grant?
AL
RATING FORM-7
V
IYANQ
2004-109
BUDGET (Maximum 30 points)
I
II
III
IV
V
How adequate and appropriate is the
staffing for the objectives and
0
3
5
7
10
activities?
How completely does the budget
identify positions to be funded with
0
2
3
4
5
grant funds?
How reasonable are the costs
identified in the budget to accomplish
0
3
5
7
10
objectives and activities?
How completely does the budget
identify the equipment needs and
0
2
3
4
5
specific equipment costs?
SUBTOTAL
(RATER: Transfer all category subtotals to page one.)
RATING FORM-8