Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-03-1992 Minutes MINUTES MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 3, 1992 COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by Mayor Holcomb at 8:34 a.m., Monday, August 3, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Member Pope- Ludlam, Miller. RECESS MEETING - CLOSED SESSION At 8:34 a.m., the Mayor and Common Council Development Commission recessed to closed following: a. to give instruction to the City' s/Commission' s negotiator on the purchase of property pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The real property which the negotiations concern is generally located at: (1) and the Community session for the , b. to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; c. to meet with designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6; d. to confer with the Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings or a threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; e. to confer with the li tigation pursuant to 54956.9(b)(1), as there litigation, attorney regarding pending Government Code Section Ls significant exposure to 1 8/3/92 f. to confer with the attorney regarding li tigation pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(c), so that Council/Commission may whether to initiate litigation; pending Section decide g. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally to "hich the City is a party pursuant to Government Code S~ction 54956.9(a) as follows: Stubblefield Construction Comoanv. et al vs. Citv of San Bernardino. et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 242998; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 252058, Countv vs. Ci tv of San Bernardino (RDA) Superior Court Case No. 258241; San Bernardino Saab vs. Citv of San Bernardino - Fourth District Court of Appeals Case No. E008652; City of San Bernardino vs. Libertv Cable T.V.. et al- United States District Court Case No. 82-6876 WMB; City of San Bernardino vs. Countv of San Bernal-dino. e-c al- Riverside Superior Court Case No. 207900; Citv of San Bernardino vs. Skadron - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 266719, Randall vs. Countv/Citv of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 250472 (consolidated with Case No. 252255) Amrut N. Patel. et al vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United States District Court Case No. CV91-1420 RG (Kx), Francis Kwai Chonq Foo vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United States District Court Case No. CV91-3056 RG (Kx), Janet Summerfield vs. William R. Holcomb. et al. - United States District Court Case No. SACV 91-731 AHS (RWR) , Tomas Armendariz. et al vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United States District Court Case No. 91-5757 CMB (JRx). CLOSED SESSION At 8:34 a.m., Mayor Holcomb called the closed session to order in the conference room of the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. 2 8/3/92 !~II;' i ;:: i i I!!: I ili ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk i,i. iJ<;rasney, City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Members :~llinipe-Ludlam, Miller. ". Also present: J. Lorraine Velarde, Executive Assistant to the Mayor; Barbara Dillon, Director of Personnel. COUNCIL MEMBER At 8:41 a.m., closed session. POPE-LUDLAM ARRIVED Council Member pope-Ludlam arrived at the READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES Deputy City Clerk Jones read the titles of all the resolutions and ordinances on the regular, supplemental, and Community Development Commission agendas while the Council was in closed session. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DILLON EXCUSED At 8:43 a.m., Barbara Dillon, Director of Personnel, left the closed session. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY SIMMONS ARRIVED At 8:43 a.m., Richard Simmons, Deputy City Attorney, arrived at the closed session. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY SIMMONS EXCUSED Richard Simmons, Deputy City Attorney, left the closed session. SR. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY RICHARD MORILLO ARRIVED Richard Morillo, Sr. Assistant City Attorney, arrived at the closed session. ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR SCROGGIN ARRIVED Margaret Scroggin, Administrative Operations Supervisor, City Attorney's Office, arrived at the closed session. RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR LORCH ARRIVED Victor Lorch, Risk Management Director, arrived at the closed session. CITY ADMINISTRATOR CLARK EXCUSED City Administrator Clark left the closed session. CITY ADMINISTRATOR CLARK RETURNED Shauna Clark, City Administrator, returned to the closed session. 3 8/3/92 J. LORRAINE VELARDE EXCUSED J. Lorraine velarde, Executive Assistant to the Mayor, left the closed session. RISK MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR LORCH EXCUSED Victor Lorch, Director of Risk Management, left the closed session. CLOSED SESSION ADJOURNED At 9:30 a.m., the closed session adjourned to the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino. RECONVENE MEETING At 9:32 a.m., Mayor Holcomb reconvened the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Krasney. Absent: Council ~lembers Pope-Ludlam, Miller, City Administrator Clark. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Rev. Barnabus Laubach, St. Bernardine's Medical Center. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was led by Council Member Reilly. COUNCIL MEMBER At 9:33 a.m., Council meeting and POPE-LUDLAM ARRIVED Council Member Pope-Ludlam arrived took her place at the council table. at the ANNOUNCEMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBER ESTRADA (2) Council Member Estrada gave a report on her trip to the Pentagon regarding the Norton conversion and to the League of California Cities in Monterey, California. CITY ADMINISTRATOR CLARK RETURNED City Administrator Clark returned to the Council meeting. 4 8/3/92 PUBLIC COMMENTS - WARNER HODGDON (3) Warner Hodgdon, 3295 Broadmoor, San Bernardino, CA, read into the record a letter dated August 3, 1992, in which he responded to allegations made at the Council meetings of July 6 and 20, 1992 concerning grading in the Highland Hills Ranch area without proper City permits. PUBLIC COMMENTS - BOB CANTU (3) Bob Cantu, 362 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA, thanked Larry Reed, Assistant Director, Planning & Building Services, for responding to his requests for information on City property in the downtown area. COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED At 9:47 a.m., Council Member Pope-Ludlam left the Council meeting. APPOINTMENT - CIVIL SERVICE BOARD - MAXINE KRAFT (S-3) In a memorandum dated July 29, 1992, Mayor W. R. "Bob" Holcomb requested the reappointment of Maxine Kraft, 2830 Mt. View, San Bernardino, CA, to the Civil Service Board. Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the reappointment of Mrs. Maxine Kraft to the Civil Service Board, be approved. APPOINTMENT - CENTRAL CITY PARKING PLACE COMMISSION - JAMES A. DAVIS (8-2) In a memorandum dated July 29, 1992, Mayor W. R. "Bob" Holcomb recommended the appointment of James A. Davis, 6099 Rogers Lane, San Bernardino, CA, to the Central City Parking Place Commission, as requested by Council Member Tom Minor, Fifth Ward. Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the appointment of James A. Davis to the Central City Parking Place Commission, be approved. APPOINTMENT - BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS - JUAN C. GONZALEZ (S-5) In a memorandum dated July 16, 1992, Mayor W. R. "Bob" Holcomb recommended the appointment of Juan C. Gonzalez, 3661 Ridge Line Drive, San Bernardino, CA, to the Board of Water Commissioners. 5 8/3/92 Council Member Hernandez made a motion, Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that Juan C. Gonzalez to the Board of Water approved. seconded by Council the appointment of Commissioners, be COUNCIL MEMBER At 9 :49 a.m., Council meeting and POPE-LUDLAM RETURNED Council Member Pope-Ludlam returned took her place at the council table. to the EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AWARDS (4) In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Les Fogassy, Sr. Real Property Specialist, Public Works Department, stated that the Employee Recognition Award Selection Committee received nominations for employee recognition awards for the second quarter of 1992. The committee chose the following winners as recipients of Employee of the Quarter Awards in each of their respective categories. All winners are entitled to a day off with pay: Management/Confidential Mid-Management Safety General Lee Gagnon Elias Shehab Lance Bauer Cynthia Buechter City Clerk Public Services Police City Clerk WAIVE READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (5) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that further reading of all resolutions and ordinances on the regular, supplemental and Community Development Commission agendas, be waived. CHANGE ORDER NO. TWO - REPLACEMENT OF SEWER LINE STREET, FROM SEVENTH STREET TO NINTH STREET - PAVLICH CONSTRUCTION IN "0" T. L. (8) In a memorandum dated July 9, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works /Ci ty Engineer, stated that during the excavation and installation of the sewer main in "D" Street, it was discovered that the sewer main on Eighth Street did not tie into the existing "D" Street sewer. The flow in the sewer main in Eighth Street appears to be impeded. In order to insure property functioning of the sewer main, it is necessary to provide a connection. Approximately 200 feet of additional sewer main is required to make the connection. The contractor, T. L. Pavlich Construction, has agreed to install the additional length of 8-inch sewer main at the contract unit bid price, plus $7.47 per linear foot for replacement of permanent pavement surfacing. This will result in an estimated increase of $8,694.00 in the contract price, from $73,940.00 to $82,634.00. 6 8/3/92 Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No. 2 to the contract with T. L. Pavlich Construction for the replacement of sewer on "D" Street, in accordance with Plan No. 8587, be approved; to authorize the contractor to install approximately 200 feet of additional 8-inch sewer pipeline, in order to connect the sewer in 8th Street to the new main in "D" Street, for an estimated increase in the contract price of $8,694.00, from $73,940.00 to $82,634.00. INSTALLATION OF GUARD RAIL LITTLE MOUNTAIN DRIVE, RANCHO AVENUE, AND WATE~~N AVENUE - APPROVAL OF PLAN NO. 8262 & AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS (12) In a memorandum dated July 22, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works /Ci ty Engineer, stated that plans for installation of guard rail on portions of Little Mountain Drive, Rancho Avenue, and Waterman Avenue, have been prepared and the project is ready to be advertised for bids. The project consists of installing metal beam guard rails at selected locations to improve traffic safety. The total estimated project cost is $319,000. Federal-Aid Hazard Eliminating Funds have been approved to finance 90% of the project costs. Caltrans has approved the final cost estimate of $319,000, which constitutes authority to increase the amount of Federal-Aid Funds for the project. Supplemental funds in the amount of $10,200 would be needed to finance the City's 10% share. It is proposed that these supplemental funds be provided from the available fund balance in the Gas Tax Fund (126). Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the plans for installation of guard rail on portions of Little Mountain Drive, Rancho Avenue, and Waterman Avenue, in accordance with plan No. 8262, be approved; and that the Director of Public Works/City Engineer be authorized to advertise for bids. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the transfer of $10,200, from Account No. 126-000-30405, "Fund Balance," to Account No. 242-362-57309, "Guard Rail - Waterman Avenue", be approved. CLAIMS AND PAYROLL (14) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the claims and payroll, and the authorization to issue warrants as listed on the memorandum dated July 20, 1992, from the Director of Finance, be approved. 7 8/3/92 ~ RES. 92-293 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING CERTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY ISSUED FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS A RESULT OF THE RECENT EARTHQUAKES ON JUNE 28, 1992. (16) RES. 92-294 - RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CENTER OF HEALTH RESOURCES PURCHASE CONNECTION, GROUP PURCHASING, DIETARY PROGRAM FOR RAW FOOD PRODUCTS FOR THE CITY'S SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAM. (18) RES. 92-295 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES AND IMPOSING LIENS ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COSTS OF THE ABATEMENT. (Weed Abatement) (19) RES. 92-296 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A CONTRACT TO A. L. CHAVEZ ENTERPRISES, INC., FOR FILL-IN STREET IMPROVEMENTS UNDER CHAPTER 27 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE. (20) .~ RES. 92-297 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION. . . DESIGNATING CERTAIN STREETS OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS. . ;" AND PROVIDING THAT BEECHWOOD AVENUE IS A THROUGH HIGHWAY AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH AZALEA AVENUE. (21) RES. 92-298 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL, CENTRAL CITY PARKING DISTRICT FOR OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SECURITY. (22) RES. 92-299 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL, EXPANSION OF FACILITIES FOR CENTRAL CITY PARKING DISTRICT. (23) RES. 92-300 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992/93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 958, SEWER AND SEWER LIFT STATION CONSTRUCTION, PEPPER AVENUE AND MILL STREET AREA. (24) 8 8/3/92 RES. 92-301 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992/93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 965, FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF LASSEN STREET, NORTH OF BASELINE STREET IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. (26) RES. 92-302 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 966, FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF DALEY CANYON ROAD, EASTERLY OF CHIQUITA LANE IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. (27) RES. 92-303 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 971, FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT IN THE TRI-CITY AREA. (28) RES. 92-304 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992/93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 973, INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT UNIVERSITY PARKWAY AND HALLMARK PARKWAY. (29) RES. 92-305 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 990, HIGHLAND AND ARDEN SECURITY AND MAINTENANCE DISTRICT. (30) RES. 92-306 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL DISTRICT NO. 1001, LANDSCAPING PENNSYLVANIA AND BIRCH AREA. SAN BERNARDINO FOR ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE, (31) RES. 92-307 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN CONFIRMING THE 1992-93 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR DISTRICT NO. 1002, LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE, STREET AREA. BERNARDINO ASSESSMENT NORTH "H" (32) RES. 92-308 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FOR FIRE PUMPER TRUCK (F-92-17) AND 100 FOOT AERIAL LADDER TRUCK (F-92- 18), TO BE UTILIZED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID SPECIFICATIONS Q20070 AND Q20075. (33) 9 8/3/92 RES. 92-309 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A SCHEDULE 3 ADDENDUM TO LEASE PURCHASE AGREEMENT NUMBER 108, DATED OCTOBER 28, 1991 TO MUNICIPAL LEASING CORPORATION FOR THE FINANCING OF ONE EACH, FIRE PUMPER TRUCK, ONE EACH, 100 FOOT AERIAL LADDER TRUCK AND RADIOS AND ACCESSORIES FOR BOTH TRUCKS, TO BE UTILIZED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID SPECIFICATIONS F-92-17, F-92-18, QUOTE Q20070 AND Q20075. (34) RES. 92-310 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO SEAGRAVES FIRE APPARATUS, INC., FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF ONE 100-FOOT AERIAL LADDER TRUCK TO BE UTILIZED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BI::J SPECIFICATION F-92- 18. (35) RES. 92-311 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO SEAGRAVES FIRE APPARATUS, INC., FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF ONE FIRE- PUMPER TRUCK TO BE UTILIZED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID SPECIFICATION F-92-17. (36) RES. 92-312 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO L. BARRIOS FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR SEVENTEEN (17) LOCATIONS, TO BE UTILIZED BY THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BI::J SPECIFICATION F-93- 02. (37) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolutions be adopted. Resol'J.tion Nos. 92-293, 92-294, 92-295, 92-296, 92-297, 92- 298,92-299,92-300,92-301,92-302,92-303,92-304,92-305,92- 306,92-307,92-308,92-309,92-310,92-311, and 92-312 were adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Miller. VACANT PARALEGAL POSITION IN CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE (6) In a memorandum dated July 27, 1992, Council Member Hernandez requested that the City Attorney be authorized to fill a vacant paralegal position in the City Attorney's Office. 10 8/3/92 Mayor Holcomb urged the Council to delay action until after completion of the audit of the City Attorney's Office. He expressed concern regarding increase in staff and the department's budget. Mayor Holcomb pointed out that Mr. Penman's budget has increased 300%. City Attorney Penman responded to concerns expressed by the Mayor and explained the need to fill the vacant position in the office. Gary Kirby, concern regarding Attorney Penman. 1505 Yardley, San Bernardino, Ca., expressed the quandary between Mayor Holcomb and City Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, to authorize the City Attorney to fill the vacant paralegal position. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor. Nays: Council Member pope-Ludlam. Absent: Council Member Miller. CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 REGRADE AND REPAVE EXISTING PARKING LOT AT MARINE-NAVY RESERVE CENTER TO MATCH NEW IMPROVEMENTS ON WATERMAN AVENUE, FROM MILL STREET TO FIFTH STREET - E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION (7) In a memorandum dated July 15, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that project plans required the installation of new curb, gutter and driveway approaches in front of the Marine-Navy Reserve Center located on Waterman Avenue, south of Fourth Street. After the new curb, gutter, and driveway approaches were installed, the existing parking lot was found to be considerably lower than the new improvements and therefore, was unusable. In order to provide vehicular access to the property, it was necessary to remove and replace the pavement for the existing parking lot, at a grade to match the newly placed curb, gutter and driveway approaches. The contractor has quoted a net price of $5,379.53 to reconstruct and pave the parking lot. City Attorney Penman requested, for the record, specific reasons for the requested change order. City Engineer Hardgrave explained that this change order was necessary in order to correct an unusable driveway approach and match the exiting parking lot at the grade of the newly placed curb, gutter and driveway approaches. 11 8/3/92 A discussion was presented at agenda meetings. held regarding detailed information being briefings rather than at the Council Mayor Holcomb requested that City Attorney Penman submit his concerns in writing to be discussed during Council agenda briefings. COUNCIL MEMBER MAUDSLEY EXCUSED Council Member Maudsley left the Council meeting. Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that Change Order No.8, to the contract with E. L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc. , for the pavement rehabilitation on Waterman Avenue, from Mill to Fifth Street, in accordance with Plan No. 8038, be approved; to authorize the contractor to regrade and repave the existing parking lot at the Marine-Navy Reserve Center to match new improvements on Waterman Avenue, at an increase in the contract price of $5,379.53, from $1,180,820.79 to $1,186,200.32. *Note: No vote was taken on the motion. City Attorney Penman stated that the law requires that sufficient information be on record regarding reasons Ior ~hange orders. Mr. Penman pointed out that the information is not included in the backup. ~ Mayor Holcomb stated that City Attorney Penman's request that City Engineer Hardgrave provide reasons for the requested changes orders was improper and a matter of unjustified criticism. Mayor Holcomb stated that for the past fifty years, the validity of the change orders has never been challenged in court. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, that agenda Item Nos. 7, 9, 10, and 11 be continued to the afternoon portion of the Council agenda, to allow Mr. Penman an opportunity to meet with City Engineer Hardgrave to explain the reasons for the change orders. See page 33. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Minor, Pope-Ludlam. None. Absent: Council Members Mauds1ey, Miller. Council Nays: 12 8/3/92 RATIFY PERFORM FINANCE CONTRACT EXPEDITED DIRECTOR RALPH ANDERSON RECRUITMENT FOR & ASSOCIATES TO THE POSITION OF ( 13) In a memorandum dated July 16, 1992, Shauna Clark, City Administrator, reported that at the Council Personnel Committee of July 9, 1992, a recommendation was made to hire the consulting firm of Ralph Anderson and Associates to perform an expedited recruitment to fill the position of Finance Director which will become vacant July 31, 1992. The cost of the contract is $10,500, plus routine expense reimbursement including advertising and printing. City Administrator Clark explained that the contract item was not acted upon at the July 20, 1992 Council meeting, and that she took the liberty, under her authority as City Administrator, to sign the contract with Ralph Anderson and Associates to expedite the recruitment for the position of Finance Director as requested by the Personnel Committee. COUNCIL MEMBER MAUDSLEY RETURNED At 10:35 a.m., Council Member Maudsley returned to the Council meeting and took his place at the council table. COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED At 10:35 a.m., Council Member Pope-Ludlam left the Council meeting. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the contract with Ralph Anderson & Associates, to perform an expedited recruitment for the position of Finance Director, be ratified. ' COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM RETURNED At 10:40 a.m., Council Member Pope-Ludlam returned to the Council meeting and took her place at the council table. PERSONNEL ACTIONS (15) Ci ty Administrator Clark answered questions regarding the personnel action requests for Frederick Wilson and Mary Hardos- Ducey. Ms. Clark explained that the requested action for Mr. Wilson is for higher acting classification, from Assistant City Administrator to Director of Finance, for a period of thirty days; and that the requested action for Mrs. Mary Hardos-Ducey is for an out-of-phase merit increase. Mrs. Ducey would be performing the duties of Mr. Wilson in the interim. 13 8/3/92 Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the personnel actions submitted by the Chief Examiner dated July 23, 1992, in accordance with all administrative regulations of the City of San Bernardino, be approved. RES. 92-313 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING COSTS OF ABATEMENTS AND IMPOSING LIENS ON CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COSTS OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES. (Building Abatement) (17) City Clerk Krasney informed the Mayor and Council property owner, Marjorie M. White, residing at 1441 W. Street, Torrance, CA 90501, paid the lien for property at 563 W. Virginia Street, San Bernardino, CA. Ms. requested that the item be deleted from Exhibit "A". that 216th located Krasney Council Member Maudsley made Member Hernandez, that the interdelineation to delete Parcel page 7 of Exhibit "A"; and that amended. a motion, seconded by C9uncil resolution be amended by No. 0145 203 13 from line 16, said resolution be adopted as The motion carried by th8 follo;,'ing vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Miller. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO EXCEL LANDSCAPE FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT SECCOMBE LAKE, TO BE UTILIZED BY THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID SPECIFICATION F-93-03. (Continued to later in the meeting. See page 37) (38) Discussion ensued regarding the poor quality of maintenance and landscaping of Seccombe Lake Park performed by the previous contractor. It was suggested that a review period of 90 days be initiated on the purchase order with Excel Landscape to ensure that all landscaping and maintenance comply with City standards. *Note: This item was continued to later in the meeting to allow the City Administrator and the City Attorney an opportunity to discuss the language in the resolution. See page 37. COUNCIL MEMBER REILLY EXCUSED Council Member Reilly left the Council meeting. 14 8/3/92 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SUBSECTION F OF SECTION 5.04.525 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BUSINESS REGISTRATION CERTIFICATES FOR COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL RENTAL OR LEASING. First (39) Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the ordinance be laid over for final adoption; APPEAL - BOARD OF BUILDING COMMISSIONERS' FINDINGS AND ACTION OF AUGUST 16, 1991 RELATING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1095 W. SPRUCE STREET - MAURICE PETERS - CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 1992 (40) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the appeal of the Board of Building Commissioners' finding and action of August 16, 1991, relating to property at 1095 W. Spruce Street, be continued to 2:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers. (See page 32) COUNCIL MEMBER REILLY RETURNED Council Member Reilly returned to the Council meeting and took his place at the council table. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BELMONT AND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (SETBACK CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 1992 ROYAL OAK AREA ONLY)- (41) This is the time authorization to proceed Maintenance District for and place continued to with the Belmont and Royal the setback area only. discuss the Oak Landscape In a memorandum dated July 28, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that a request was received to form an assessment district for the maintenance of landscaping for front and side yards within the setback areas of Tentative Tract No. 14997 located within the boundaries of Belmont Avenue, Palm Avenue and Chestnut Avenue. The petition is the result of requirements by the City for the developer to establish the district. The assessment includes the maintenance of landscaping, energy costs, and administrative costs. The maintenance of landscaping will only be done in the event the property owner fails to maintain their respective properties within the setback areas. City Engineer Hardgrave explained that an appeal has been received on Tentative Tract No. 14997, and the appeal is scheduled to be heard August 17, 1992. Mr. Hardgrave requested that the Belmont and Royal Oak Landscape Maintenance District item be continued to August 17, 1992 15 8/3/92 Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the item relative to the Belmont and Royal Oak Landscape Maintenance District, be continued to August 17, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. REVIEW OF POLICES AND PRACTICES RELATING TO CALCULATION OF BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES FOR APARTMENT COMPLEXES - V. ALAN SWENSEN OF HILL WILLIAMS - CONTINUED FROM JULY 20, 1992 (42) This is the time and place continued to for review of polices and practices relating to the calculation of business registration fees for apartment complexes requested by V. Alan Swensen of Hill Williams. It was pointed out that V. Alan Swensens' concerns regarding the business registration fees for apartment complexes have bet" resolved by the amendment to San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 5.04.525, Subsection "F". *Note: (See related Item No. 39 for the ordinance) Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the item be tabled. BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES FOR COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES- JIMMY SUMMERS - CONTINUED FROM JULY 20, 1992 (43) This is the time and place continued to consider business registration fees for commercial properties as requested by Jimmy Summers. It was pointed out that Jimmy Summers' concerns regarding the business registration fees for commercial properties have been resolved by the amendment to San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 5.04.525, Subsection F. *Note: (See related Item No. 39 for the ordinance) Council Member Maudsley made a motion, Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, tabled. seconded by Council that the item be UNLICENSED ONGOING CAR WASHES (44) In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, James F. Penman, City Attorney, stated that several City offices have received complaints of ongoing car washes being conducted on the property of other businesses without business licenses. The "bootleg" car washes are having significant adverse effect on licensed car washes within the City. Some of these car washes are contending that they are being operated as church fund raisers even though they are being conducted up to three times a week. 16 8/3/92 City Attorney Penman requested that a review be made of the City's policy relating to car washes. Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the matter of ongoing car washes operating without a City Business Registration Certificate be referred to the Legislative Review Committee. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MAYOR'S ACTIONS AND DIRECTIVES RELATIVE TO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - CONTINUED FROM JULY 20, 1992 (45) In a memorandum dated July l6, 1992, Council Member Esther Estrada, First Ward, requested that the Council discuss and take possible action regarding the Mayor's recent actions and directives relative to the City Attorney's Office. Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the matter relative to the Mayor's recent actions and directives for the City Attorney's Office be heard as the last item on the Council's agenda. (See page 37) RES. 92-314 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CANCELLATION OF LEASE AND GRANT OF FACADE EASEMENT BY AND BETWEEN MT. VIEW CEMETERY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. (S-l) Discussion ensued regarding ownership of the cemetery and the possibility of subleasing the office building located at the southwest corner of Mt. View Cemetery. The Mayor and Common Council discussed the efforts of the volunteer group responsible for making the improvements to the facade and exterior structure of the office building. Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, that the resolution be adopted with Agreement "B" . Ayes: Minor, Miller. Resolution No. 92-314 was adopted by the following vote: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member 17 8/3/92 APPROVE FUNDING IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 TO AID IN GANG INTERVENTION, JOB REHABILITATION PROGRAMS. - LOS PADRINOS TRAINING AND (5-4) In a memorandum dated July 29, 1992, Council Member Ralph Hernandez, Third Ward, requested funding assistance in the amount of $25,000 on behalf of Los Padrinos, to aid in gang intervention, job training, and rehabilitation programs. It was pointed out that since the funding for the Los padrinos project would come from the Collateralized Mortgage Obligation (CMO) monies, any action regarding this matter should be taken under the Community Development Commission's portion of the agenda. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that the funding request for Los padrinos be tabled. RES. 92-315 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, FOOD DISTRIBUTION SECTION FOR COMMODITIES DONATED BY THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING SERVICE FOR USE IN THE CITY'S SUMMER FOOD SERVICE FOR USE IN THE CITY'S SUMMER FOOD SERVICE PROGRAM FOR CHILDREN DURING THE PERIOD JUNE 29, 1992 THROUGH AUGUST 28, 1992. (S-6) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, that said resolution be adopted. Ayes: Minor, Miller. Resolution No. 92-315 was adopted by the following vote: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member RECESS MEETING At 11:05 a.m., Mayor Holcomb declared a five-minute recess. RECONVENE MEETING At 11:11 a.m., the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council reconvened in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Sr. Assistant City Attorney Barlow, City Clerk Krasney. Absent: City Administrator Clark; Council Member Miller. 18 8/3/92 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - REGULAR MEETING At 11:11 a.m., Chairman Holcomb called to order the regular meeting of the Community Development Commission. EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT PROGRAM (ESGP) FUNDING AWARD (R-2) In a memorandum dated July 29, 1992, Kenneth J. Henderson, Executive Director of the Development Department, stated that on June 15, 1992, the Mayor and Council approved a Request for Proposals for the City's Fiscal Year 1992/93 Emergency Shelter Grant Program in the amount of $43,000, and authorized staff to solicit proposals from qualified non-profit entities. Staff was directed to utilize the Housing Committee to review eligible proposals and make funding recommendations to the Mayor and Common Council. On July 28, 1992, the Housing Committee considered several proposals and recommended that funds be allocated in the amount of $18,000, to the Salvation Army; and $25,000 to the Frazee Community Center. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and Common Council approve funding from the FY 1992/93 Emergency Shelter Grant Program (ESGP) to the Frazee Community Center in the amount of $25,000 and the Salvation Army in the amount of $18,000, pursuant to an ESGP Request for Proposals previously approved for issuance by the Mayor and Common Council. RES. 92-316 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A CERTAIN DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND BILLY ARDT, INC. (UPTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA) (R-3) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolution be adopted. Ayes: Minor, Miller. Resolution No. 92-316 was adopted by the following vote: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member OPTION HOUSE, INC. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ADDITIONAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (R-4) Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and Common Council ratify its action of February 17, 1992 taken in conjunction with the Option House Housing Development Project. 19 8/3/92 RES. 92-317 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING .AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND OPTION HOUSE, INC., EFFECTIVE MAY 22, 1992, FOR ADDITIONAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. (R-4) Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolution be adopted. Ayes: Minor, Miller. Resolution No. 92-317 was adopted by the following vote: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member RES. 92-318 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMENDING THE MEMBERS OF THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THE UPTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND DISSOLVING THE COMMITTEE. (R-10) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolution be adopted. Ayes: Minor, Miller. Resolution No. 92-318 was adopted by the following vote: Council Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member IMPROVEMENT OF HUNTS LANE GRADE CROSSING NO. B-541.0- PLAN NO. 8297 (R-11) In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that only one bid was received for the improvement of the Hunts Lane grade crossing. The contractor had included additional traffic control, insurance, and requirements of Southern Pacific Railroad, concerning inspection and safety, which exceeded the Engineer's estimate of $51,000 by 94%. Since the contractor indicated he would not be willing to perform the specified work on a time and material basis, Cal Trans and staff agreed to reject the bid and re-advertise the project with certain modifications. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the bid received for the improvement of the Hunts Lane Railroad Crossing, per Plan No. 8297, be rejected as it was 94% over the Engineer's estimate, and that authorization be granted ~o re-advertise for bids. 20 8/3/92 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PRE-SCHOOL SERVICES _ HEADSTART PROGRAM - 2382 DEL ROSA AVENUE (R-13) In a memorandum dated July 29, 1992, Kenneth J. Henderson, Executive Director of the Development Department, reported that staff received a request from Head Start for $1,500.00 for development permit fees to open a Child Development Program at 2382 Del Rosa Avenue in the City of San Bernardino. Staff has determined that the request submitted by Head Start is eligible for Community Development Block Grant Funding. On July 30, 1992, the Community Development Citizens Advisory Committee reviewed the request and recommended approval by the Mayor and Common Council. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and Common Council appropriate $1,500 in CDBG Appropriated Reserve Account Funds for a development permit for the Head Start facility located at 2382 Del Rosa Avenue. RES. 92-319 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CAMP FIRE - SAN ANDREAS COUNCIL. (R-14) RES. 92-320 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CHILDREN'S FUND. (R-15) RES. 92-321 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND EASTER SEAL SOCIETY AND INLAND AREA HEAD INJURY GROUP. (R-16) RES. 92-322 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND HIGHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL ON AGING, INC., HIGHLAND SENIOR CENTER. (R-17) 21 8/3/92 RES. 92-323 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GAANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CI'fY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND HIGHLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL ON AGING, INC. _ HEALTH ENHANCEMENT CENTER/WELLNESS PROGRAMS. (R-18) RES. 92-324 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND MARY'S MERCY CENTER, INC. (R-19) RES. 92-325 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND ROLLING START, INC. - HELPLINE. (R-20) RES. 92-326 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND ROLLING START, INC., DEAF SERVICES. (R-2l) RES. 92-327 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND GREATER SAN BERNARDINO AREA SPECIAL OLYMPICS. (R-22) RES. 92-328 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - PROJECT LEO. (R-23) RES. 92-329 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES - CID ANNEX. (R-24) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly, that said resolutions be adopted. 22 8/3/92 Resolution Nos. 92-319, 92-320, 92-321, 92-322, 92-323, 92- 324, 92-325, 92-326, 92-327, 92-328, and 92-329 were adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Counc il Members Estrada, Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Miller. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REPEALING CHAPTER 3.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ENTERPRISE ZONE. First (R-26) Council Member Minor made a motion, Member Maudsley, that said ordinance be adoption. seconded by Council laid over for final The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Council Member Estrada. Absent: Council Member Miller. Council Nays: RES. 92-330 COUNCIL OF THE RESOLUTION NOS. -76 RELATING TO RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REPEALING 86-354, 85-411, 85-405, 85-163, AND 83 THE CITY'S ENTERPRISE ZONE. (R-26) Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Maudsley, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No. 92-330 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope- Ludlam. Nays: Council Member Estrada. Absent: Council Member Miller. RECESS MEETING At 12:02 p.m., the regular mee~ing of the Mayor and Common Council recessed to 2:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. RECONVENE MEETING At 2:10 p.m., Mayor Holcomb reconvened the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam; Deputy City Attorney Empeno, City Clerk Krasney. Absent: Council Members Reilly, Miller; City Administrator Clark. 23 8/3/92 APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-32 - TO ESTABLISH A vEHrr-:LE RECYCLING YARD - SOUTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET, EAST OF MUSCOTT STREET - JOHN LIGHTBURN - CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 1992 (46) This is the time and place continued to for an appeal f the Planning Commission's denial of request for a one-year exc~nsicn of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, to establish a vehicle recycling yard located on the south side of Walnut Street, 380 feet east of Muscott Street. The applicant is John Lightburn. In an undated memorandum, Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Building Services, stated that on June 15, 1992, the Mayor and Common Council heard the appeal of the extension of time request for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32. During the hearing, several environmental concerns were expressed regarding the pro j ect. Among those concerns were adequate screening through height of wall and landscaping, property maintenance, noise, and the use of public address (PA) systems on the site. Staff reviewed the proposal and provided new conditions of approval and standard requirements to mitigate the concerns. Staff has recommended that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal and approve a one-year extension of time, until January 8, 1993, for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject to the findings of fact contained in the Planning Commission staff report of March 3, 1992, and the attached conditions of approval and standard requirements (Exhibit "A"). Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing. Larry Services, Use Permit Reed, Assistant Director gave background information No. 90-32. of Planning & Building regarding the Conditional John Lightburn, P. O. Box 1622, San Bernardino, Ca., representing Bud Long, stated that the owner has agreed to all conditions as outlined by the staff with the exception of the effective date on the extension of time . He proposed that the extension date be set from today's date in order for Mr. Long to complete all plans for his project. Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney, advised the Council that the application request to extend the period of time past the one year limitation from the date the original conditional use permit expired would be inconsistent with the City's Development Code. 24 8/3/92 He stated that the ordinance has provisions which could be the basis for legal challenge. Discussion ensued regarding the ordinance being silent concerning the effective date on extension of time requests. Mr. Lightburn pointed out that a full the extension of time in order for Mr. entire application process. He proposed time be set from the date the application April 20, 1992. 12 months is needed on Long to complete the that the extension of was deemed complete on Larry Reed explained that the ordinance is not specific as to whether the twelve months starts from the date the application is approved or from the date the Council takes action to approve. Mr. Reed answered questions and stated that if the extension of time was granted with an effective date of 12 months from today, from an operational standpoint it could allow the applicant to proceed without completing the entire approval process. Mr. Reed stated that granting the extension of time from the time the application was deemed complete would be more reasonable. A member of the Council requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney's Office regarding the legalities of what can or cannot be done in terms of extending the effective date. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Pope-Ludlam, that the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council uphold the appeal and approve the extension of time for one year, until January 8, 1993, for Conditional Use permi t No. 90-32, subject to the findings of fact contained in the Planning Commission staff report of March 3, 1992, and the attached conditions of approval and standard requirements (supports staff recommendation and appellant's request). The motion carried by Members Estrada, Maudsley, Member Hernandez. Absent: the following vote: Ayes: Council Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: Council Council Members Reilly, Miller. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, to reconsider action relative to the one-year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 in order that separate motions can be registered. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the public hearing be closed. 25 8/3/92 Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Pope-Ludlam, that the Mayor and Common Council uphold the appeal and approve the extens ion 0 f time for one year, until August 3, 1993, for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject Lw the findings of fact contained in the Planning Commission staff report of March 3, 1992, and the attached conditions of approval and standard requirements. The motion carried by Members Estrada, Maudsley, Member Hernandez. Absent: the following vote: Ayes: Council Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: Council Council Members Reilly, Miller. APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF VARIANCE NO. 92-10 - TO CONSTRUCT A 95-FOOT TALL FREEWAY SIGN - I- 215 NORTHBOUND OFFRAMP, UNIVERSITY PARKWAY CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT LTD (QUIEL BROS. SIGN CO.) (47) This is the time and place set for an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of Variance No. 92-10, to construct a 95 foot tall freeway sign and a center identification monument sign located at the northeast corner of the I-215 northbound offramp and University Parkway. The appeal is filed by Quiel Bros. Sign Co. representing the applicant, Camden Development LTD. In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Building Services, stated that applicant is requesting a variance from Development Code Sections 19.14.030 (6) , 19.22.150(C)(3)(e) and 19.22.150(C)(3)(f), to construct a 95-foot tall freeway oriented sign identifying seven tenants and a center identification monument that identifies six tenants. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of University Parkway and Interstate I-215 northbound offramp, and is at the westerly terminus of the Shandin Hills area. On July 7, 1992, the Planning Commission denied Variance No. 92-10 based on statements that the excess sign area was unwarranted and that the flag test to determine the minimum height for freeway visibility was conducted inaccurately. On July 16, 1992, the appellant conducted a new flag test with Planning staff and a City building inspector observing the operation. Based on the flag test results, the bottom of the target was 62 feet above the ground before it became visible from the observation distance; which translates to an overall height of 98 feet above natural grade. It is staff's determination that the height suggested by the flag test will create a negative visual impact that cannot be mitigated. The proposal is consistent with the Development Code except for the following components: 26 8/3/92 1. A 95-foot tall freeway oriented sign identifying seven tenants is proposed, whereas the Development Code allows a maximum height of 25 feet with identification of the center name and the major tenant only; 2. A center identification monument sign is proposed to identify six tenants, whereas the Development Code permits the identification of no more than three tenants; 3. A convenience store within 1000 feet of another convenience store, as measured from property line to property line, is proposed, whereas the Development Code requires a minimum distance of 1,000 feet between parcels containing such uses. Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing. Larry Reed, Assistant Director, Planning & Building Services, presented background information as contained in the staff report dated July 23, 1992. Ari Miller, 148 Palm Drive, Los Angeles, CA stated that for the last fifteen months he has been working with the community in trying to develop an upscale restaurant row and shopping center at the offramp of university Parkway and I-215. He stated that the parcel will contain restaurants, gas station, a bank, and a retail building. He stated that upon completion of the project approximately 160 full time jobs will be provided t9 the community. Mr. Miller stated that his project is located adjacent to Highway 215. A flag test conducted by Quiel Bros. revealed that there is a large hill directly behind the site which completely blocks the first 65 feet of any sign. Because of this it is requested that a taller sign be approved due to the unique topographic nature of the site. He stated that there is a proposal for seven tenant sign panels to accommodate the tenants. Gary Quiel, Quiel Bros. Sign Co., 272 South "I" Street, San Bernardino, CA, stated that a document had been distributed to the Mayor and Council in hopes of clarifying confusion at the Planning Commission meeting. He stated that there was some confusion regarding the flag test conducted by Quiel Bros. He stated that Quiel Bros was initially unable to gain access to the exact area where the sign is proposed due to grading. Mr. Quiel stated there is another concern related to the sign design. He stated that the Planning Department had requested that the sign be redesigned. However, the Planning Commission did not receive a copy of the revised design. Each of 27 8/3/92 the tenant signs would only be seven foot by seven foot which equals 49 square feet per major tenant per each side of the sign. He stated that these are single tenants which will own parcels next to the freeway. Larry Reed answered questions regarding the total fc-ctage allowed per parcel for free standing freeway sign. He :.ated that there would have to be an excess of 300 linear feet of the freeway frontage for each business in order for each tenant to have its own free standing freeway sign. Mr. Quiel answered questions regarding the flag test. He stated that the flag test was performed exactly on the site and was taken at a speed of 55 m.p.h. Mr. Reed answered questions regarding the number of signs allowed under City code. He stated that only one sign is allowed to identify the shopping center and one other major tenant for freeway oriented signs. Freeway oriented signs are the taller signs allowed along the freeway. Mr. Reed stated that there are other signs allowed along the secondary street. Mr. present present. Reed answered questions and stated during the flag test, but that a that City he was Planner not was Mr. Quiel answered questions and stated that there were no other signs along the freeway that would be blocked by the proposed sign. He stated that the height requested will not exceed the height of the existing Del Taco sign. Mr. Quiel explained that what was presented before was a sign for 95 feet. After redesigning the sign, the footage has been increased to III feet. Mr. Miller answered questions regarding the seven tenant signs. Mr. Miller stated that signed a lease and that he has received proposals International House of Pancakes. identity of McDonald's from Texaco the has and Ken Laguna, 409 Norton, Hemet, CA, General Manager for Jack in the Box located at University Parkway, expressed support for the sign variance. Mr. Laguna further requested that the Council reconsider his request for a sign variance for the Jack in the Box restaurant. Council Member Estrada made a Member Hernandez, and unanimously hearing be closed. motion, seconded carried, that by Council the public Discussion ensued regarding the height of the sign and the type of businesses that may be listed on the sign. 28 8/3/92 Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, that the Mayor and Common Council deny the appeal of Variance No. 92-10, based on findings of fact contained in Exhibit 5. The Members Estrada, motion failed by the following vote: Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor. Nays: pope-Ludlam. Absent: Council Members Ayes: Council Council Members Reilly, Miller. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, to reconsider the request for Variance No. 92- 10, to allow Mr. Paul Brown an opportunity to speak. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Hernandez, Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: Council Member Maudsley. Absent: Council Members Reilly, Miller. Paul Brown, consultant for Quiel Bros. Sign Co., answered questions regarding the sign design. He advised Council that the City's Planning staff recommended the sign design listed in the staff report. Mr. Reed stated that the sign listed in the staff report contains aesthetic problems. Staff suggested that the sign be redesigned. He stated that if Council voted to grant the variance, staff would suggest that Quiel Bros be directed to come back with more architectural treatment for the sign as required by the Development Code. Mr. Brown agreed to continue the matter for thirty days to improve the sign design aesthetically. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the appeal of Variance No. 92-10, be continued for thirty days (September 8, 1992) with the understanding that the applicant bring back improved freeway sign designs. PUBLIC HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15451 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 92-04 - CONSTRUCT PHASE I (68 UNITS) OF A TWO- PHASE, 118 UNIT AFFORDABLE VICTORIAN TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT (48) This is the time and place set for a public hearing on the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 15451 and Conditional Use Permit No. 92-04, to construct Phase I (68 units) of a two-phase, 118 unit affordable Victorian townhouse development. The subject property consists of several parcels 29 8/3/92 within Street west. 91786. a city block bounded by 6th Street on the south, on the east, 7th Street on the north and "G" Street on The applicant is Empire Bay, 985 Via Serana, Upland, "FII the CA, In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Building Services, reported that the applicant's request for approval of Tentative Tract No. 15451 was approved by the Planning Commission on July 21, 1992. Staff recommended that the Mayor and Council adopt the ~iti~at~c Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting 2.:'",'- .-3.11': .'md approve Conditional Use Permit No. 92-04 and Tentative ~ract 15451, based on the attached conditions of approval and standara requirements in Exhibit 1. Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing. John Lightburn, 149 West Sixth Street, San Bernardino, CA, expressed concern relative to the down payment needed for a family to obtain the home. He felt that a contingency fund should be established to offset the down payment costs in order to make the project economically feasible. Mr. Lightburn further stressed concerns that the project lacked adequate plans for landscaping and maintenance; and lacked provisions for a children's playground. Mr. Lightburn suggested the need for further review of the financing package to determine that the project is achievable for low-income family households. Dan Fauchier, 672 North "F" Street, San Bernardino, CA, Division of Community Lane Trust, house moving contractor, stated that this project is designed as a community land trust which carries a number of advantages. One of the advantages is that the entire parcel is a single parcel that is owned by the people who live there. Mr. Fauchier stated that on-site maintenance is the land trust through membership of the community. neighbors are asked to join the land trust which will needs of the residents in that particular block. provided by Adjoining service the John Husing, Financial Consultant, Inland Empire Management Center, Cal State University, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA, answered questions regarding the method of determining the financing package for low to moderate income households to qualify to purchase the townhomes. Mr. Fauchier answered questions regarding provisions for playground facilities. He stated that there are two tot lots planned for the project. 30 8/3/92 It was suggested that the matter be continued for two weeks to allow further review of the financing package figures used to determine how low-income households would qualify to purchase the townhomes. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that the public hearing relative to Tentative Tract No. 15451 and Conditional Use Permit No. 92-04, be continued to Monday, August 17, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. RECESS MEETING At 3:41 p.m., Mayor Holcomb declared a five-minute recess. RECONVENE MEETING At 3:48 p.m., Mayor Holcomb reconvened the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council in the Council Chambers of City Hall. ROLL CALL Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Estrada, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor; Deputy City Attorney Empeno, City Clerk Krasney. Absent: Council Members Reilly, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Administrator Clark. COUNCIL MEMBER At 3:49 p.m., Council meeting and POPE-LUDLAM RETURNED Council Member Pope-Ludlam returned took her place at the council table. to the APPEAL - BOARD OF BUILDING COMMISSIONER'S FINDINGS AND ACTION OF AUGUST 16, 1991 - PROPERTY AT 1095 W. SPRUCE STREET - MAURICE PETERS - CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 1992- DISCUSSED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 15 (40) This is the time and place continued to consider an appeal of the Board of Building Commissioners' findings and action of August 16, 1991, relating to property located at 1095 W. Spruce Street. The appellant is Maurice Peters. In a memorandum dated July 30, 1992, Al Boughey, Director of Planning & Building Services, provided a summary of previous Council actions regarding property located at 1095 W. Spruce. Since May 31, 1991, the Code Compliance Division has made inspections of the property which revealed that abandoned vehicles, large amounts of junk, trash and debris were located on the property. Inspection of the structure also revealed substandard conditions and hazardous electrical wiring. Numerous appeal hearings were held and staff was directed to conduct other inspections. Inspection reports filed by staff have shown 31 8/3/92 that Mr. Peter has made slow progress in abating the public nuisance. At the July 6, 1992 Council meeting, Mr. Peters claimed that his procedural Que process rights had been violated. As '" result, the Mayor and Council requested staff to make a written reply to Mr. Peters' allegations. The response to Mr. Peters' allegations have been summarized into two main areas, procedural due process and insufficiency of evidence. Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing. Larry Reed, Assistant Director of Planning & Building Services, responded to the allegations made by Mr. Peters as outlined in the staff report dated July 30, 1992. COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ EXCUSED At 3:51 p.m. Council Member left the Council meeting. A member of the Council stated that she had observed a laundry line and a boarded up vehic Ie on the property. It was pointed out that the Council has tried to accommodate Mr. Peters on this matter for almost a year. Council Member Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and Common Council order the owner to obtain all proper permits within ten days to correct all health and safety violations or to demolish the structure within sixty days; further, after the time frame has elapsed and owner compliance is not obtained, the City will initiate abatement and the property owner will incur contractor abatement costs and all related direct costs as a personal obligation and be placed as a lien upon the property. CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 REGRADE AND REPAVE PARKING LOT AT MARINE-NAVY RESERVE CENTER TO IMPROVEMENTS ON WATERMAN AVENUE, FROM MILL FIFTH STREET - E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION - FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE II EXISTING MATCH NEW STREET TO CONTINUED (7) This is the time and place continued to from earlier in the meeting to consider Change Order No.8, with E. L. Yeager Construction to regrade and repave existing parking lot at Marine-Navy Reserve Center to match new improvements on Waterman Avenue, from Mill Street to Fifth Street. City Attorney Penman stated that after meeting with City Engineer Hardgrave it was determined that the consultant had made errors in estimate costs on projects relating to change order agenda Item Nos. 7, 9, 10, II, and 25. Mr. Penman stated that the City may be able to regain some of the money from the consultant. 32 8/3/92 A discussion ensued regarding the events which occurred that required additional change orders to complete the job. COUNCIL MEMBER HERNANDEZ RETURNED At 4:10 p.m., Council Member Hernandez returned to the Council meeting and took his place at the council table. Mayor Holcomb suggested that a workshop be held to discuss reasons for change orders and that Caltrans be contacted to conduct the workshop. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No.8, to the contract with E. L. Yeager Construction Company, Inc., for the pavement rehabilitation on Waterman Avenue, from Mi'll to Fifth Street, in accordance with Plan No. 8038, be approved; to authorize the Contractor to regrade and repave the existing parking lot at the Marine-Navy Reserve Center to match new improvements on Waterman Avenue, at an increase in the contract price of $5,379.53; from $1,180,820.79 to $1,186,200.32; with the understanding there will be an attempt to recoup some of the costs from the consultant wherever possible. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - REMOVAL OF 3, 91 7 . II CUBIC YARDS OF FILL AND MOVE DIRT TO SELECTED SITE- CONSTRUCTION OF PARK AND STREET IMPROVEMENT FOR BUCKBOARD PARK VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE CONTINUED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 12 (9) In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, construction plans, prepared by a consulting indicated that the dirt excavated at the would be used to construct the fills. Roger G. stated landscape Buckboard Hardgrave, that the architect, Park site However, there is a surplus of 3,917.11 cubic yards of dirt that must be removed from the site, in order to allow the contractor to complete the improvements on the contract plans. The dirt will be used to fill a large depression within the unimproved portion of Al Guhin Park. The contractor has quoted a price of $3.30 per cubic yard for transporting the surplus fill material from Buckboard Park to the depression in Al Guhin Park. This work will reduce the cost that will be incurred for future expansion of Al Guhin Park. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No.2, to the contract with Valley Crest Landscape, Inc., for construction of park & street improvements for Buckboard Park, in accordance with Plan Nos. 7539 and 7662, be approved; to authorize the contractor to remove 3,917.11 cubic yards of fill and move the dirt to a selected site, at an increase in the 33 8/3/92 contract price of $12,926.47; from $434,118.70 to $447,045.17; with the understanding there will be an attempt to recoup some of the costs from the consultant wherever possible. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - FURNISH AND INSTALL 92 ADDITIONAL TREES AND INSTALL 21,412 SQ. FT. OF SIDEWALK - CONSTRUCTION OF PARK AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOR BUCKBOARD PARK - VALLEY CREST LANDSCAPE - CONTINUED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 12 (10) In a memorandum dated July 23, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that plans and specifications for the contract presently under construction by Valley Crest Landscape, Inc., are for basic park improvements, such as grading, security lighting, lawn, irrigation systems, street improvements, and a portion of the trees. The Contractor has agreed to furnish and install the additional 92 trees at the unit bid price of $55.80. The low bid was $125,488.74 (24.3%) under the Engineer's estimate. These funds can be used to finance the estimated cost of $44,103.44 for Change Order No.1. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No. I, to the contract with Valley Crest Landscape, Inc. , for construction of park & street improvements for Buckboard Park, in accordance with Plan Nos. 7539 and 7662, be approved; to authorize the contractor to furnish and install 92 additional trees, and install 21,412 sq. ft. of sidewalk at an increase in the contract price of $44,103.44; from $390,015.26 to $434,118.70; with the understanding there will be an attempt to recoup some of the costs from the consultant wherever possible. APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 9 - FURNISH AND INSTALL HARDWARE FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT SYSTEM- PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ON WATERMAN AVENUE, FROM MILL TO 5TH STREETS - E. L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION - CONTINUED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 12 (11) In a memorandum dated July 21,1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Public Works/City Engineer, reported that the plans and special provisions for the rehabilitation of pavement on Waterman Avenue, from Mill Street to Fifth Street, required that the existing traffic signals be upgraded. The existing traffic signals are located at the Rialto Avenue, Second Street, Third Street, Fourth Street, and Fifth Street intersections. Upgrading of these traffic signals consists of removing the curbed medians and poles for the left-turn phases, and installing new traffic signal poles with longer mast arms. A new interconnect system was also to be provided. This system will 34 8/3/92 allow in-office monitoring operation revise timing as deemed necessary. price quote for furnishing and appurtenant items. of the traffic signals and The contractor provided a installing the necessary Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No.9, to the contract with E. L. Yeager Construction for pavement rehabilitation on Waterman Avenue, from Mill to Fifth Streets, in accordance with Plan No. 8038, be approved; to authorize the Contractor to furnish and install hardware for a traffic signal interconnection system, at an increase in the contract price of $7,616.74 from $1,186,200.32 to $1,193,817.06; with the understanding there will be an attempt to recoup some of the costs from the consultant wherever possible. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 959 DRIVE, SHANDIN HILLS - MENTONE TURF & SUPPLY - LANDSCAPE KENDALL (25) In a memorandum dated July 16, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reported that maintenance of the large slope area and additional landscaping area, 213,906 square feet, was assumed by Assessment District No. 959, on April 1, 1992, after the one year plant establishment period had expired. The contractor submitted a price quote of $43,357.40 for basic bid plus the supplemental items of work in connection with the maintenance of landscaping in portions of Kendall Drive and Shandin Hills, through Assessment District No. 959. Funds to finance the costs incurred for the contract and incidental costs will be provided through an inter fund loan from the Sewer Line Construction Fund (245). The actual costs incurred will be recovered in the following year through assessments on the parcels within Assessment District No. 959. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member pope-Ludlam, and unanimously carried, that Change Order No.4, to the contract with Mentone Turf and Supply, for maintenance of landscaping in Assessment District No. 959, in accordance with plan No. 6360, be approved; to adjust the contract price, for the additional work included in the contract by Change Order No.2, by $22,818.15, from $10,839.25 to $33,657.40. 35 8/3/92 RES. 92-331 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING AN INTERFUND LOAN FROM THE SEWER LINE CONSTRUCTION FUND (245) TO THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND (251), IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,818.15 TO FRONT THE ESTIMATED COSTS INCURRED FROM APRIL 1, 1992, TO JUNE 30, 1992, IN CONNECTION WITH THE MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING IN PORTIONS OF KENDALL DRIVE AN~: .:".'NDIN HILLS, THROUGH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 959. (2C\ Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Pope-Ludlam, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution No. 92-331 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Estrada, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope- Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent: Council Members Reilly, Miller. RES. 92-332 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO EXCEL LANDSCAPE FOR THE FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FOR LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION AT SECCOMBE LAKE, TO BE UTILIZED BY THE PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID SPECIFICATION F-93-03. (38) Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada, that said resolution be adopted. Resolution Ayes: Council Nays: Council Reilly, Miller. No. 92-332 was adopted by the following vote: Members Estrada, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam. Member Hernandez. Absent: Council Members DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING MAYOR'S ACTIONS AND DIRECTIVES RELATIVE TO CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - CARRIED OVER FROM JULY 20, 1992 - CONTINUED FROM EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 16 (45) This is the time and place continued to from earlier in the meeting to discuss and take possible action regarding Mayor's actions and directives relative to the City Attorney's Office. Council Member Estrada voiced concern regarding the conflict between the Mayor and City Attorney. She pointed out that the conflict should be resolved as expeditiously as possible for the benefit of the City. Ms. Estrada offered her help to mitigate the situation. Mayor Holcomb responded by outlining the duties of the mayor as established in the City's Charter. 36 8/3/92 COUNCIL MEMBER At 4:33 p.m., meeting. POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED Council Member Pope-Ludlam left the Council Mayor Holcomb referred to a document dated July 2, 1992, in which he requested various information from the City Attorney regarding the attorney's caseload; and a request for documentation and information regarding statements made by City Attorney Penman at the July 6, 1992 Council meeting concerning the Grand Jury Investigation Report. Mayor Holcomb requested that the City Attorney either prove his charges or apologize. City Attorney Penman voiced concerns that the audit of his department be conducted fairly. Mr. Penman addressed issues involving the working relationship between the Mayor and himself. It was pointed out that further discussion should be held in closed session as it may pertain to pending litigation. COUNCIL MEMBER At 4 :46 p.m., meeting. POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED Council Member Pope-Ludlam left the Council CLOSED SESSION At 4:53 p.m., the regular meeting recessed to closed session for the following: a. to give instruction to the CitY's/Commission's negotiator on the purchase of property pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The real property which the negotiations concern is generally located at: ; b. to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; c. to meet with designated representatives regarding labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6; d. to confer with the Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings or a threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; e. to confer with the attorney regarding pending Ii tigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), as there is significant exposure to litigation; 37 8/3/92 f. to confer with the attorney regarding litigation pursuant to Government Code 54956.9(c), so that Council/Commission may whether to initiate litigation; pending Section decide g. to confer with the attorney regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally to which the City is a party pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) as follows: Stubblefield Construction Company. et al vs. City of Sa, Bernardino. et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 242998; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 252058; County vs. City of San Bernardino IRDA) - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 258241; Saab vs. City of San Bernardino - Fourth District Court of Appeals Case No. E008652; City of San Bernardino vs. Liberty Cable T.V.. et al- United States District Court Case No. 82-6876 WMB; City of San Bernardino vs. County of San Bernardino. et al- Riverside Superior Court Case No. 207900; City of San Bernardino vs. Skadron - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 266719; Randall vs. Countv/Citv of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 250472 (consolidated with Case No. 252255) Amrut N. Patel. et al vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United States District Court Case No. CV91-1420 RG (Sx); Francis Kwai Chona Foo vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United Stated District Court Case No. CV91-3056 RG (Kx); Janet Summerfield vs. William R. Holcomb, et al. - United States District Court Case No. SACV 91-731 AHS (RWR); Tomas Armendariz. et al vs. James F. Penman. et al. - United States District Court Case No. 91-5757 CMB (JRx). ANNOUNCEMENT BY CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Penman announced that the following case would be discussed in closed session: Lawrence Crain vs. Citv of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 229990. 38 8/3/92 CLOSED SESSION At 4:53 p.m., Mayor Holcomb called the closed session to order in the conference room of the Council Chambers of City hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. ROLL CALL ii :',1 illi::II;: ,Ii 1'.1 Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasr;ey with the following .',.,.1." ""being present: Mayor Holcomb; Counc~l Members Estrada, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Members Reilly, Miller. Also present: J. Lorraine Velarde, the Mayor; Victor Lorch, Director of Assistant City Attorney Morillo; Administrative Operations Supervisor. Executive Assistant to Risk Management; Sr. Margaret Scroggin, VICTOR LORCH EXCUSED Victor Lorch, Director of Risk Management, left the closed session. ROGER Roger arrived at HARDGRAVE ARRIVED Hardgrave, Director the closed session. of Public Works/City Engineer, ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION At 5:20 p.m., the closed session adjourned. ADJOURNMENT (49) At 5:20 p.m., the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council adjourned to Monday, August 17, 1992 at 8:30 a.m., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. RACHEL KRASNEY City Clerk By /f~ e,";' Q,,, , Diane fones, Deputy City Clerk No. of Items: No. of Hours: 81 9 hrs. 39 8/3/92