HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-02-1992 Minutes
MINUTES
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 2, 1992
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the
City of San Bernardino was called to order by Mayor Holcomb at
8:30 a.m., Monday, March 2, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken by City Clerk Krasney with the following
being present: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez,
Maudsley, Minor; City Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Clark.
Absent: Council Members Estrada, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City
Attorney Penman.
RECESS MEETING - CLOSED SESSION (1)
At 8:30 a.m., the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission recessed to closed session for the
following:
a. to give instruction to the CitY's/Commission's
negotiator on the purchase of property pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.8. The real property
which the negotiations concern is generally located at:
.
,
b. to consider personnel matters pursuant to Government
Code Section 54957;
c. to meet with designated representatives regarding labor
relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6;
d. to confer with the Chief of Police on matters posing a
threat to the security of public buildings or a threat
to the public facilities pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957;
e.
to confer with the
litigation pursuant to
54956.9(b)(1), as there
litigation;
attorney regarding pending
Government Code Section
is significant exposure to
f.
to confer with the attorney regarding
litigation pursuant to Government Code
54956.9(c), so that Council/Commission may
whether to initiate litigation;
pending
Section
decide
1
3/2/92
g. to confer with the attorney regarding pending
litigation which has been initiated formally to which
the City is a party pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) as follows:
Stubblefield Construction Company. et al vs. Citv of San
Bernardino. et al - San Bernardino Superior Court Case No.
242998; San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 252058;
Citv of Redlands vs. Inland Valley Development Aaencv. et al
- San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 255222;
Countv vs. Citv of San Bernardino IRDA) - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. 258241;
Citv of
Indians.
6899 WJR
San
et al
(Bx);
Bernardino vs. San Manuel Band of Mission
- United States District Court Case No. 85-
Saab vs. Citv of San Bernardino - Fourth District Court of
Appeals Case No. E008652;
Citv of San Bernardino vs. Libertv Cable T. V.. et al-
United States District Court Case No. 82-6876 WMB;
City of San Bernardino vs. Countv of San Bernardino. et al-
Riverside Superior Court Case No. 207900;
Thomas Armendariz. et al vs. James F. Penman. et al - United
States District Court Case No. 91-5757 CMB (WRx);
Matthew Hobbs vs. Ci tv of San Bernardino. et al San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 250971;
Davis vs. Countv of San Bernardino - San Bernardino Superior
Court Case No. 252971;
Ci tv of San Bernardino vs. Bvouna Koo Chin. et al - San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 266926;
Nu-Tech Developers. et al vs. Redevelopment Aaencv - San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. 240494;
Citv of San Bernardino vs. InterAmerican Builders. et al-
San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCV-249477.
CLOSED SESSION
At 8: 30 a.m., Mayor Holcomb called the closed session to
order in the conference room of the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
2
3/2/92
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken with the following being present: Mayor
Holcomb; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor; City
Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council
Members Estrada, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Attorney Penman.
Also present: Margaret Scroggin, Administrative Operations
Supervisor, City Attorney's Office; Barbara Skropos, Deputy City
Attorney.
READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
Deputy City Clerk Jones read the titles of all the
resolutions and ordinances on the regular, supplemental and
Community Development Commission agendas while the Council was in
closed session.
COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER ARRIVED
At 8:33 a.m., Council Member Miller arrived at the closed
session.
CITY ATTORNEY PENMAN ARRIVED
At 8:33 a.m., City Attorney Penman arrived at the closed
session.
COUNCIL MEMBER
At 8:47 a.m.,
closed session.
POPE-LUDLAM ARRIVED
Council Member Pope-Ludlam
arrived at the
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY SKROPOS EXCUSED
Deputy City Attorney Skropos left the closed session.
ADMINISTRATIVE
Administrative
closed session.
OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR SCROGGIN EXCUSED
Operations Supervisor Scroggin left
the
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR DILLON ARRIVED
At 8:50 a.m., Personnel Director Dillon arrived at the
closed session.
ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION
At 8:59 a.m., the closed session adjourned to the regular
meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino.
RECONVENE MEETING
At 9:36 a.m., Mayor Holcomb called the regular meeting to
order in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street,
San Bernardino, California.
3
3/2/92
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken with the following being present: Mayor
Holcomb; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor,
Pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Krasney,
City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Rev. Barnabas Laubach of St.
Bernardine's Medical Center.
PLEDGE
The pledge of allegiance was led by Council Member Maudsley.
APPOINTMENT - FRANCHISE BUREAU - GEORGE WILDER (4)
In a memorandum dated February 25, 1992, Mayor "Bob" Holcomb
recommended the appointment of George Wilder, 2744 W. Rialto
Avenue, Sp. 53, Rialto, Ca., to the Franchise Bureau, as
requested by Council Member Hernandez, Third Ward.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, to approve the appointment
of George Wilder to the Franchise Bureau.
APPOINTMENT
SJOSTRAND
SENIOR AFFAIRS COMMISSION
GEORGE
(4)
In a memorandum dated February 17, 1992, Mayor "Bob" Holcomb
recommended the appointment of George W. Sjostrand, 1734 Bonita
Vista Dr., San Bernardino, Ca., to the Senior Affairs Commission.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, to approve the appointment
of George W. Sjostrand to the Senior Affairs Commission.
APPOINTMENT - PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION - HOWARD
J. ROTH (S-l)
In a memorandum dated February 26, 1992, Mayor "Bob" Holcomb
recommended the appointment of Howard J. Roth, 2742 Jefferson
Avenue, San Bernardino, Ca, to the Parks and Recreation
Commission, as requested by Council Member Hernandez, Third Ward.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, to approve the appointment
of Howard J. Roth to the Parks and Recreation Commission.
4
3/2/92
RESOLUTION
TRANSPLANT
STULTZ
COMMENDING ST. BERNARDINE'S
CENTER - MS. JULIE HUMESTON AND MS.
KIDNEY
JOANNE
(4)
J. Lorraine Velarde, Executive Assistant to the Mayor, read
a resolution urging the United States Congress to approve and
issue the National Organ Donor's Medal, to show our nation's
deep appreciation to those who gave the gift of life; and that a
copy of this resolution be prepared and transmitted to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives of the United States of
America.
Ms. Julie Humeston, and Ms. Joanne Stultz from St.
Bernardine's Kidney Transplant Center, accepted the resolution.
PROCLAMATION - LITERACY MONTH - MARCH 1992 - MS. S'ANN
FREEMAN - LITERACY COORDINATOR (4)
J. Lorraine Velarde, Executive Assistant to the Mayor, read
a resolution proclaiming the month of March, 1992 as Literacy
Month in the City of San Bernardino.
Ms. S'Ann Freeman, Literacy Coordinator, and Robert Ewing,
City Librarian, accepted the resolution.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - DAVID MURPHY (3)
David Murphy, a resident of San Bernardino, spoke regarding
the conduct of the San Bernardino City Police Department,
specifically the SMASH Unit. He felt that all police officers
should announce themselves before entering a residence.
PUBLIC COMMENTS - MARCO J. SORTILLON
(3)
Ci ty Clerk Krasney read into the record a letter, dated
February 25, 1992, from Marco J. Sortillon, 495 E. 3rd Street, F-
14, San Bernardino, Ca., concerning the City's financial
situation.
WAIVE FURTHER READING OF RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (5)
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that further reading of
all resolutions and ordinances on the regular, supplemental and
Community Development Commission agendas, be waived.
5
3/2/92
COUNCIL MINUTES
(6)
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the minutes of the
following meetings of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino, be approved as sub;:1itted in typewritten form:
January 6, 1992; January 21, 1992.
SET PUBLIC HEARING 10:00 A.M., MARCH 16,
SPECIAL FEE AREA - PALM AVENUE BOX CULVERT AT
CREEK - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT PALM/KENDALL DRIVE
1992-
CABLE
(7)
In a memorandum dated February 13, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, requested authorization
to set a pubic hearing at 10:00 a.m., March 16, 1992 to adopt a
resolution setting a special fee area for the Palm Avenue box
culvert at Cable Creek and traffic signal at Palm Avenue and
Kendall Drive.
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that a public hearing be
set for March 16, 1992, at 10:00 a.m. for adoption of resolution
setting a special fee area for Palm Avenue box culvert at Cable
Creek and traffic signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive.
ACQUISITION OF A PA/RECORD PLAYER - NICHOLSON COMMUNITY
CENTER - APPROVAL OF THIRD WARD PARK EXTENSION FUNDS
(9)
In a memorandum dated February 20, 1992, Annie Ramos,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, stated that
acquisition of a combination public address system/record player
is needed at the Nicholson Community Center. The PA/recorder
component would allow for a wide range of programs for the
children and tiny tots at the center. The unit has been
recommended by the Center's Advisory Board.
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that $512 from Third Ward
Park Extension Funds for the acquisition of a PA/record player
for Nicholson Center, be approved.
SALARY REDUCTION
COORDINATOR
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
TECHNICAL
( 11)
In a memorandum dated February 20, 1992, Barbara Dillon,
Director of Personnel, stated that on February 20, 1992, the
Council Personnel Committee approved the request to reduce the
salary of the Telecommunications Technical Coordinator. The
individual who fills this position is no longer accountable for
managing the Communications Maintenance Shop.
6
3/2/92
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that a change of the
salary for Telecommunications Technical Coordinator, from Range
2361, $2,434 $3,262/month, to Range 2352, $2,329-
$3,121/month, be approved.
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the Personnel
Department be directed to update Resolution 6413, Section 10, and
Resolution 6433.
CLAIMS AND PAYROLL
(12)
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the claims and
payroll, and the authorization to issue warrants as listed on the
memorandum dated February 21, 1992, from the Director of Finance,
be approved.
RES. 92-73 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CONFIRMING COSTS OF ABATEMENTS AND IMPOSING LIENS ON
CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COSTS OF THE ABATEMENT
OF PUBLIC NUISANCES. (Building Abatement) (14)
RES. 92-74 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT WITH THE COUNTY
Or SAN BERNARDINO RELATING TO THE CITY'S UTILIZATION OF
MINORS IN THE JUVENILE WORK PROGRAM. (IS)
RES. 92-75 - RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION
OF CERTAIN POLICE RECORDS, DOCUMENTS AND PAPERS,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 34090 AND 34090.5 OF THE GOVERNMENT
CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. (17)
RES. 92-76 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CONFIRMING COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCES AND
IMPOSING LIENS ON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE COSTS OF THE
ABATEMENT. (Weed Abatement) (18)
RES. 92-77 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AWARDING A CONTRACT TO ALL PRO MASONRY, A. J . V . FOR
CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX FOOT BLOCK WALL AT NICHOLSON PARK
AND FIRE STATION NO.9. (19)
7
3/2/92
RES. 92-78 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 1004 FOR THE IMPROVEMENT
OF PORTIONS OF COMMERCENTER EAST AND HOSPITALITY LANE,
IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND APPROVING ASSESSMENT
DIAGRAM MAP NO. 1004. (20)
RES. 92-79 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AWARDING A PURCHASE ORDER TO FAIRVIEW FORD FOR THE
FURNISHING AND DELIVERY OF THREE (3) EACH, ONE TON FLAT
BED TRUCKS, TO BE UTILIZED BY THE PUBLIC
SERVICES/STREET DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH BID
SPECIFICATION F-92-15. (22)
RES. 92-80 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ACKNOWLEDGING THE RECEIPT AND FILING OF THE ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE YEAR 1992. (23)
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, that said resolutions be adopted.
Resolution Nos. 92-73, 92-74, 92-75, 92-76, 92-77, 92-78,
92-79, and 92-80 were adopted by the following vote: Ayes:
Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam,
Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
ORD. MC-822 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO ADDING CHAPTER 2.75 TO THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE USE OF THE CITY'S
TELEVISION/CATV BROADCAST FACILITIES BY THE MAYOR OR
MEMBERS OF THE COMMON COUNCIL. Final (24)
ORD. MC-823 - ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AMENDING SECTIONS 19.04.010(1), 19.04.030(2),
19.06.010(1), 19.06.030(2), 19.08.010(1), 19.10.010(1)
AND 19.10.030 AND TABLES 04.01, 04.03, 06.01 AND 06.03
OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (DEVELOPMENT CODE)
TO ESTABLISH LEGALLY EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
UNITS AS PERMITTED, CONFORMING USES IN ALL LAND USE
DISTRICTS CITYWIDE AND TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS FOR
ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS AND EXPANSIONS TO SUCH DWELLING
UNITS. Final (25)
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, that said ordinances be adopted.
Ordinance Nos. MC-822 and MC-823 were adopted by the
following vote: Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez,
Mauds ley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent:
Council Member Estrada.
8
3/2/92
SET PUBLIC HEARING 10:00 A.M. MARCH 16,
ESTABLISHMENT OF VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICE FEES
1992-
(8)
In a memorandum dated February 20, 1992, Fred Wilson, Acting
Director of Telecommunications, stated that the Division has
accommodated various requests from non-profit organizations to
complete video production on a contract basis. It is recommended
that a fee structure be established for remote camera shoots,
studio production services, video cassette purchases, and
duplication services. The fees are based on actual cost which
include camera and video equipment as well as personnel costs. It
is estimated that approximately $10,000 per year in revenues will
be generated through this fee schedule.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADDING CHAPTER
3.73 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "USER FEES FOR
VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES," AUTHORIZING THE COLLECTION
OF USER FEES FOR VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES.
First (8)
City Administrator Clark explained that an ordinance was
prepared to accompany the request to establish video production
service fees. The ordinance gives authority to set the video
production service fees. Ms. Clark requested that the ordinance
receive its first reading at today' s meeting with the second
reading to be given at the public hearing on March 16, 1992.
City Attorney Penman provided an opinion on the legalities
of having the first reading of the ordinance prior to having the
public hearing. He stated that based on the Attorney General's
opinion which ruled that as long as the wording on the agenda and
the backup presents the public with sufficient advance
information, it would be proper to proceed with the first reading
of the ordinance.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Miller, that first reading of the ordinance be waived.
*Note: (No vote was taken at this time)
City Administrator Clark answered questions regarding
authority to charge for video services. Ms. Clark pointed out
that although there was a resolution adopted to establish the
video service fees, there is no ordinance enabling those fees.
A discussion ensued regarding Sixth Ward residents who pay
for cable services, but are unable to receive Channel 3 programs.
It was suggested that these residents be compensated for not
receiving Channel 3 programs.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, that further reading of the ordinance be waived.
9
3/2/92
City Administrator Clark answered questions and stated that
the ordinance would be reviewed by the Cable TV Commission on
March 3, 1992.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Miller. Nays:
Council Member Pope-Ludlam. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
City Administrator Clark read the ordinance in its entirety.
Mayor Holcomb requested a motion to lay the ordinance over
for final adoption.
Council Member Hernandez made a substitute motion, seconded
by Council Member Maudsley, that said ordinance be referred to
the Cable TV Commission.
Mayor Holcomb urged the Council to defeat the substitute
motion.
The motion failed by the following vote: Ayes:
Member Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays: Council
Reilly, Minor, Miller. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
Council
Members
Discussion ensued regarding language in the ordinance to
make it mandatory that the Telecommunications Division charge
for video services.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, that a public hearing to discuss the establishment
of video production service fees be set for March 16, 1992 at
10:00 a.m., and that said ordinance be laid over for final
adoption.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Members Reilly, Maudsley, Minor, Miller. Nays:
Hernandez, Pope-Ludlam. Absent: Council Member
Ayes:
Council
Estrada.
Council
Members
REQUEST TO ALLOW FIREWORKS AT FISCALINI FIELD - JULY 3
THROUGH 4, 1992 - SAN BERNARDINO SPIRIT BASEBALL CLUB
(10)
In a memorandum dated February 17, 1992, Annie Ramos,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, stated that
the San Bernardino Spirit Baseball Club has requested that the
Municipal Code prohibiting fireworks shows at Fiscalini Field be
reconsidered. The Club is requesting to have a fireworks display
during their home games July 3 and 4, 1992. Spirit
representatives have suggested mitigating measures if they are
allowed to have a display.
10
3/2/92
Discussion ensued regarding the approval of fireworks at
Fiscalini Field last year. It was pointed out that approval of
fireworks at Fiscalini Field was to be a one-time event.
City Attorney Penman explained that in order to approve the
Spirit's request this year, an amendment to Municipal Code
Section 8.60.120.B, relating to fireworks in high fire areas,
would be required.
Council Member Miller made a
Member Minor, that the request
Baseball to allow firework shows at
4, 1992, be denied.
motion, seconded by Council
from San Bernardino Spirit
Fiscalini Field on July 3 and
The motion carried by the following vote:
Members Reilly, Hernandez, Minor, Pope-Ludlam,
Council Member Maudsley. Absent: Council Member
Ayes:
Miller.
Estrada.
Council
Nays:
PERSONNEL ACTIONS
( 13)
City Administrator Clark answered questions regarding
duplicate items appearing on the personnel actions list. Ms.
Clark requested that this item be continued until later in the
afternoon for more information. (See page 30)
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION
RECOMMENDED
OF THE CITY OF SAN
NO. 6433, SECTION FOUR,
FOR DELETION.
BERNARDINO AMENDING
REFLECTING VACANCIES
(16)
Discussion ensued regarding whether the resolution was
reviewed by the Personnel Committee.
City Administrator Clark explained that the resolution
reflected vacancies which occurred as a result of action taken in
February 1992 to balance the mid-year budget. The positions that
were vacated would be removed from Resolution No. 6433. She
further stated that if the City'S financial condition improved,
the deleted positions can be reinstated in the resolution.
The Mayor and Council discussed the necessity of removing
vacant or deleted post ions from Resolution No. 6433.
A discussion was held regarding the existence of City policy
to freeze all positions throughout the City except for the Fire
and Police Departments.
Mayor Holcomb requested the Council to make a motion to
approve said resolution.
No action was taken due to lack of a motion.
11
3/2/92
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PRELIMINARILY
DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE FORMATION OF A LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOCATED ALONG THE
PARKWAYS AND MEDIAN STRIPS OF WATERMAN AVENUE BETWEEN
BASELINE STREET AND INTERSTATE 10; DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO PROCEED TO ORDER WORK WITHIN THE DISTRICT,
TO BE KNOWN AS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1000; AND
SETTING AND DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF A TIME
AND DATE OF A PUBLIC HEARING. (21)
COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER EXCUSED
At 10:28 a.m., Council Member Miller left the Council
meeting.
Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/Engineering,
answered questions regarding future assessment costs that would
be imposed on single family residents living within the district.
Mr. Hardgrave described the type of landscaping that would
be installed along the median strips.
The Council requested that renderings of the proposed
landscaping be prepared.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, that said resolution be adopted.
At the consensus of the Council, the resolution was
continued until later in the meeting to allow Council Member
Miller an opportunity to vote. (See Page 13)
COUNCIL MEMBER MINOR EXCUSED
At 10:32 a.m., Council Member Minor left the Council
meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING ESTABLISHING A FILING FEE FOR
INITIATIVE PETITIONS (26)
This is the time and place set for a public hearing to
establish a filing fee for initiative petitions.
In a memorandum dated January 30, 1992, Rachel Krasney, City
Clerk, stated that adoption of the resolution would allow the
City Clerk to charge a $200 filing fee to proponents of
initiative petitions.
12
3/2/92
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ESTABLISHING A
FILING FEE FOR INITIATIVE PETITIONS. (26)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Council Member Hernandez made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the public hearing
be closed.
City Clerk Krasney answered questions regarding provisions
to refund the filing fee in lieu of sufficient signatures.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, that said resolution be adopted.
Note: Vote was taken later in the meeting. See page 13
COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER RETURNED
Council Member Miller returned to the Council meeting and
took her place at the council table.
COUNCIL MEMBER MINOR RETURNED
Council Member Minor returned to the Council meeting and
took his place at the council table.
RES. 92-81 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PRELIMINARILY DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND
NECESSITY REQUIRE THE FORMATION OF A LANDSCAPE
INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LOCATED ALONG THE PARKWAYS AND MEDIAN STRIPS OF
WATERMAN AVENUE BETWEEN BASELINE STREET AND INTERSTATE
10; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROCEED TO ORDER WORK
WITHIN THE DISTRICT, TO BE KNOWN AS ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 1000; AND SETTING AND DIRECTING PUBLICATION OF
NOTICE OF A TIME AND DATE OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
(Discussed earlier in the meeting. See page 11) (21)
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Minor, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 92-81 was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
RES. 92-82 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ESTABLISHING A FILING FEE FOR INITIATIVE PETITIONS-
(Discussed earlier in the meeting. See page 12) (26)
Council Member Miller made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, that said resolution be adopted.
13
3/2/92
Resolution No. 92-82 was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
PUBLIC HEARING - SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT
AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT (27)
This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider
the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household
Hazardous Waste Element.
In a memorandum dated February 19, 1992, Manuel Moreno, Jr.,
Director of Public Services, stated that the final Plan and
Element has been published. Notice was placed in the local
newspaper informing the public of the document review
availability, and of the March 2, 1992 public hearing. The CEQA
review process has been completed and all comments answered.
Staff recommends adoption of the CEQA process resolution with a
mitigated negative declaration, and adoption of the final Source
Reduction and Recycling Plan and the Household Hazardous Waste
Element.
RES. 92-83 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ADOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND THE MITIGATION REPORTING/
MONITORING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
NO. 9l-09B, THE SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT
AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ELEMENT. (27)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Kevin Barnes, Refuse
California Integrated Waste
required the City to reduce
and 50% by the year 2000.
Superintendent, explained that the
Management Act of 1989 (AB 939) has
its landfill capacity by 25% by 1995
No public comments were received.
Council Member Miller made a motion,
Member pope-Ludlam, and unanimously carried,
closed and said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 92-83 was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
seconded by Council
that the hearing be
COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED
Council Member pope-Ludlam left the Council meeting.
14
3/2/92
PUBLIC HEARING - ALLEY VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE
NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY WEST OF "E" STREET, BETWEEN MAGNOLIA
AVENUE AND EVANS AVENUE (28)
This is the time and place set for a public hearing to
consider a request to vacate a portion of the north/south alley
West of "E" Street, between Magnolia Avenue and Evans Avenue.
In a memorandum dated February 10, 1992, Roger Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/Engineer, stated that property owners,
James Adams, P. Aguilar, and American Red Cross, have requested
that the City vacate the northerly portion of the north/south
alley west of "E" Street, between Magnolia Avenue and Evans
Avenue. Utility companies and City Departments were notified of
the proposed vacation and no comments were received.
RES. 92-84 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH
ALLEY LYING WEST OF "E" STREET, BETWEEN MAGNOLIA AVENUE
AND EVANS AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
RESERVING EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES
THEREIN. (28)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that the hearing be
closed and the findings of fact as set forth in the staff report
from Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer,
as to why a portion of that certain north/south alley lying west
of "E" Street, between Magnolia Avenue and Evans Avenue, is no
longer necessary for street purposes, be adopted; and that said
resolution be adopted.
Ayes:
Miller.
Ludlam.
Resolution No. 92-84 was adopted by the following vote:
Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor,
Nays: None. Absent: Council Members Estrada, Pope-
PUBLIC HEARING STREET
NORTH/SOUTH ALLEY WEST OF
STREET AND MAGNOLIA AVENUE
VACATION OF
"E" STREET,
A PORTION OF
BETWEEN 14TH
(29)
This is the time and place set for a public hearing to
vacate a portion of the north/south alley west of "E" Street,
between 14th Street and Magnolia Avenue.
In a memorandum dated February lO, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that Mrs. Cook,
owner of Cook's Upholstery Supplies, requested that the City
vacate a portion of the north/south alley lying west of "E"
15
3/2/92
Street, between 14th Street and Magnolia Avenue. Mrs. Cook's
request was heard twice in an effort to protect her business, her
home, and an apartment building from persons who insist on
unauthorized/illegal use of the alley. Utility companies and City
Departments were notified of the proposed vacation and no
comments were received.
RES. 92-85 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE NORTH/SOUTH
ALLEY LYING WEST OF "E" STREET, BETWEEN 14TH STREET AND
MAGNOLIA AVENUE IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
RESERVING EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES THEREIN.
(29)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that the hearing be
closed and the findings of fact as set forth in the staff report
from Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer,
as to why a portion of that certain north/south alley, west of
"E" Street, between 14th Street and Magnolia Avenue, is no longer
necessary for street purposes, be adopted; and that said
resolution be adopted.
Ayes:
Miller.
Ludlam.
Resolution No. 92-85 was adopted by the following vote:
Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor,
Nays: None. Absent: Council Members Estrada, Pope-
COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM RETURNED
Council Member Pope-Ludlam returned to the Council meeting
and took her place at the council table.
PUBLIC HEARING - STREET VACATION OF A PORTION OF A
NORTH/SOUTH "PAPER" STREET AND THE REMAINDER OF AN
EAST /WEST ALLEY, SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE, WEST OF
VALARIA DRIVE (30)
This is the time and place set for a public hearing to
consider a request to vacate a portion of the north/south "paper"
street and the remainder of an east/west alley, south of Highland
Avenue, west of Valaria Drive.
In a memorandum dated February 10, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that Mr. Virgil
Franks has requested that the City vacate a portion of the
north/south "paper" street, and the remainder of the east/west
alley lying south of Highland Avenue and west of Valaria Drive.
This portion of the "paper" street lies between his home and his
business. A portion also lies within the City of Highland. The
City of Highland had no negative comments concerning the proposed
16
3/2/92
vacation. Utility companies and City Departments were notified
of the proposed vacation and no negative comments were received.
RES. 92-86 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN
NORTH/SOUTH "PAPER" STREET, AND THE REMAINDER OF THE
EAST/WEST ALLEY, LYING SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND
WEST OF VALARIA DRIVE, AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES THEREIN. (30)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Council Member Miller made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that the hearing be
closed and the findings of fact as set forth in the staff report
from Roger G. Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer,
as to why a portion of that certain north/south "paper" street
and the remainder of the east/west alley lying south of Highland
Avenue and west of Valaria Drive, are no longer necessary for
street purposes, be adopted; and that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 92-86 was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
PUBLIC HEARING VERDEMONT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE FEE
INCREASE RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS - CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 17, 1992 (31)
This is the time and place continued to for a public hearing
to increase the Verdemont Area infrastructure fees.
In a memorandum dated February 25, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that staff has
completed the Second Amendment to the Engineer's Report and is
recommending an increase in the fee from the present level of
$6,976 to $7,699. The increase is based on actual construction
costs, loan repayment for funds advanced for addi tional
construction, and adjustments based on the construction cost
index published in the Engineering News Record.
All area residents were advised that the fees would be
adjusted and estimates placed the adjustment at 15% per year for
the first three years and 10% per year for the next two.
However, compliance with AB 1600 requires the adjustments to
reflect actual changes in costs as reflected in the Engineer's
Report.
17
3/2/92
RES. 92-87 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REVISING SECTION 1 OF RESOLUTION 90-2 RELATING TO THE
AMOUNT OF AN INFRASTRUCTURE FEE TO BE LEVIED FOR RIGHT-
OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. (31)
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Hernandez, and unanimously carried, that the hearing be
closed, and that the resolution establishing the increase in
infrastructure fee from $6,976 to $7,699, be adopted.
Resolution No. 92-87 was adopted by the following vote:
Ayes: Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Ludlam, Miller. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
NIGHTLY NEWS PROGRAM UPDATE - CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY
3, 1992 (33)
This is
relative to
Bernardino.
the
the
time and place continued
nightly news program in
to for an
the City
update
of San
Phil Arvizo, Executive Assistant to the Council, stated that
the Mayor and Council have received a proposal from Arrowcom
relative to the nightly news program.
Stephani Congdon, Chairman of the Cable
Commission, requested an opportunity for the Cable
Commission members to review the proposal submitted by
Television
Television
Arrowcom.
Mayor Holcomb suggested that this matter be continued to the
adjourned regular meeting of Saturday, March 7, 1992 for further
discussion.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that discussion
relative to the nightly news program be continued to Saturday,
March 7, 1992, at 8:30 a.m., in the Economic Development Agency
Board Room, 201 North "E" Street, San Bernardino, California.
WAIVER OF FEES FOR USE OF HERNANDEZ COMMUNITY CENTER-
ANTI-DRUG AND GANG RALLY APRIL 9, 1992 JAMES
ELDER'S ALL-AMERICAN YOUTH FOUNDATION (34)
In a memorandum dated February 10, 1992, Annie Ramos,
Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, reported
that James Elder applied for use of the Hernandez Community
Center on April 9, 1992, to conduct an Anti-Drug and Gang rally.
Mr. Elder also requested a waiver of fees in the amount of $350,
which includes rental costs for use of the gymnasium, assembly
18
3/2/92
rooms A and B, and the kitchen.
charges, there is a $100 refundable
also requested to be waived.
In addition to the rental
clean-up deposit fee that is
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Miller, that the request to waive fees in the amount of
$350 for use of Hernandez Community Center for an anti-drug and
gang rally, be denied.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller. Nays:
Member Reilly. Abstain: Council Member Hernandez.
Council Member Estrada.
Council
Council
Absent:
WAIVER OF FEES AND CO-SPONSOR
PARADE - MARCH 14, 1992
ST. PATRICK'S DAY
(35)
In a memorandum dated February 24, 1992, Shauna Clark, City
Administrator, stated that the La Quinta Inn and the St.
Patrick's Day Committee have requested financial assistance
through co-sponsorship of its St. Patrick's Day parade scheduled
for March 14, 1992. The waiver of fees for use of City manpower
and equipment amounts to $2463.80.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Miller, that the request for waiver of fees in the amount
of $2,463.80 to cover the costs associated with the conduct of
the St, Patrick's Day Parade on March 14, 1992, be denied.
The Council discussed alternative funding sources. It was
suggested that the Economic Development Agency locate a source
of funds for this proposal.
Council Member Reilly made a substitute motion, seconded by
Council Member Pope-Ludlam, that the matter be referred to the
Economic Development Agency to locate a funding source.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller. Nays: Council
Members Reilly, Hernandez. Absent: Council Member Estrada.
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Hernandez, that the request for waiver of fees and co-
sponsorship for the St. Patrick's Day Parade, be placed on the
agenda for the March 7, 1992 Council meeting.
*Note: No vote was taken on this motion.
continued further discussion until later in the
staff to confer with the Administrator of
Development Agency regarding alternative funding
page 31.
The Council
afternoon for
the Economic
sources. See
19
3/2/92
POLICY FOR SELECTION OF
AND CITY LAND PURCHASES
RELATED ITEM R-5)
BROKERS - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
- COUNCIL MEMBER ESTRADA (SEE
(36)
In a memorandum dated February 24, 1992, Council Member
Estrada requested an opportunity to discuss and take possible
action regarding the policy for selection of brokers for
Redevelopment Agency and City land purchases.
Phil Arvizo, Executive Assistant to the Council, on behalf
of Council Member Estrada, requested that the matter be continued
to the next Council meeting.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Miller, and unanimously carried, that the matter relative
to the policy for selection of brokers for Redevelopment Agency
and City land purchases be continued to March 16, 1992, in the
Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San
Bernardino, California.
SELECTION OF OPTIONS AND POLICY DIRECTION
1992/93 BUDGET
FOR FY
(37)
In a memorandum dated February 24, 1992, Shauna Clark, City
Administrator, requested that the Mayor and Council make certain
decisions for next year's budget that would give the department
heads, and the Budget Committee general direction and save a
tremendous amount of staff time. The following list of options
could reduce the necessity for across-the-board cuts:
1.
Eliminate
reserve.
or reduce
the
$1,000,000
appropriated
2. Forego or reduce the $1,000,000 dedicated to repayment
of existing deficit.
3. Identify programs to be eliminated (this action will
create further layoffs).
4. Approve additional chargebacks to EDA for maintenance
of City Hall parking structure: $112,973 (less income
from leases: $57,000) $55,973.
5. Refinance City Hall - create a savings of $500,000 per
year (a total of $1,000,000 this year and next if this
year's payment has not been made) and eliminates the
need for $1,000,000 dedicated to repayment of existing
deficit.
6.
Raise taxes:
$880,000.
Each 1/2 cent on utility tax equals
20
3/2/92
Discussion ensued regarding previous action taken in
February 1992 to balance the budget. Included in those actions
were the elimination of 57 positions, approval of Redevelopment
Agency chargebacks, increase in the utility users tax, and other
cost-reducing measures.
The Council inquired into the status of the San Manuel
Mission Band of Indians' request to relocate its facilities.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, to eliminate or reduce the appropriated reserve by
one-half; to reduce repayment of existing deficit by one-half; to
approve additional chargebacks to EDA for maintenance of City
Hall parking structure; and to refinance City Hall.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Members Reilly, Hernandez, Minor, Pope-Ludlam,
Council Member Maudsley. Absent: Council Member
Ayes:
Miller.
Estrada.
Council
Nays:
Mayor Holcomb suggested that a vote be taken separately on
each of the proposed options.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, to reduce the appropriated reserve account by
$500,000.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Members Reilly, Hernandez, Minor, Pope-Ludlam,
Council Member Maudsley. Absent: Council Member
Ayes:
Miller.
Estrada.
Council
Nays:
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, to reduce the amount
dedicated to repayment of existing deficit by $500,000.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, to approve additional chargebacks to EDA for
maintenance of City Hall parking structure in the amount of
$112,973 (less income from leases of $57,000) $55,973.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members Reilly, Maudsley, Minor, Miller. Nays: Council Member
Pope-Ludlam. Abstain: Council Member Hernandez. Absent:
Council Member Estrada.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, to refinance City Hall.
21
3/2/92
SERVICE
PERCENT
ADOPTED
USERS TAX INCREASE TO EIGHT AND ONE-HALF
ACTION TAKEN CONCERNING ORDINANCE MC-820
ON FEBRUARY 17, 1992 (38)
City Attorney Penman explained that at the Council meeting
of February 2, 1992, the Council's action relative to the
ordinance on service users tax increase needed to be clarified.
At the request of the City Attorney, the City Council
verbally clarified and confirmed the intent of their action taken
at the February 3, 1992 Council meeting wherein they enacted
Ordinance No. MC-820 increasing the utility tax by 1/2 percent to
eight and one-half percent.
It was the Council's intent that such increase would take
effect 31 days from the final reading of such ordinance.
Therefore, Ordinance No. MC-820 would take effect on March 19,
1992. The sunset clause would expire on June 30, 1995, three
years from July 1, 1992.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - REGULAR MEETING
At 11:36 a.m., Chairman Holcomb called the regular meeting
of the Community Development Commission to order in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino,
California.
COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER EXCUSED
At 11:38 a.m., Council Member Miller left the Council
meeting.
MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT - RIDESHARE COORDINATOR
POSITION (R-3)
In a memorandum dated February 17, 1992, Peggy Ducey,
Assistant City Administrator, reported that the City's part-time
Rideshare Coordinator has been developing the required Trip
Reduction Plan for the City and the Economic Development Agency
for the past two years. Unfortunately, as part of the budget
reductions by the Council, the part-time Rideshare Coordinator
position was eliminated. It is recommended that the Economic
Development Agency pay a portion of the Coordinator's salary, in
the amount of $3000, to continue to develop and implement the
Trip Reduction Plan for the Economic Development Agency.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and
Common Council and Community Development Commission approve
contractual agreement and Master Services Agreement with the
Economic Development Agency for the position of Rideshare
Coordinator.
22
3/2/92
WEST SIDE PLAZA
(R-4)
In a memorandum dated February 26, 1992, Kenneth J.
Henderson, Executive Director of the Development Department,
stated that a construction loan for the West Side Plaza Project
has been approved, and the project is under construction. The
funding mix for the Agency's maximum obligation of $4.5 million
included a $1,848,000 Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG). The
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will provide
$1. 00 in UDAG funds for every $2.98 spent on the project in
private funds.
The Development Department staff has been requested by the
National Bank of Long Beach to open an account to assure that
ample UDAG matching funds will be available when the bank
releases its private matching funds. The account will be an
interest bearing one in the name of the Agency.
Work has already been completed in the project that is
eligible for UDAG reimbursement upon HUD' s approval. The bank
has released, and the Agency has received $505,279 of the
original $700,000. At the conclusion of the project, the Agency
will have $505,279 plus interest on deposit in the new account
with the bank.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Maudsley, and unanimously carried, that the Mayor and
Common. Council authorize staff to open a new bank account with
the National Bank of Long Beach with withdrawals to be executed
by the Executive Director of the Development Department or
designee to facilitate the securing and payment of Urban
Development Action Grant Funds from the Federal Government.
CITY BROKER SELECTION PoLICY
(R-5 & 36)
In a memorandum dated February 24, 1992, Council Member
Estrada, requested to discuss and take possible action regarding
the policy for selection of brokers for Redevelopment Agency and
City land purchases.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Pope-Ludlam, and unanimously carried, that the matter
relative to the City's broker selection policy be continued to
March 16, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North
"D" Street, San Bernardino, California, so that Council Member
Estrada can be present at the meeting. (See related item #36)
23
3/2/92
RES. 92-88 - A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
CURRENT REFUNDING OF A PORTION, AND THE DEFEASANCE OF
THE REMAINDER, OF THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING $18,840,000
SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (GNMA
MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES), SERIES 1990A, APPROVING
ESCROW TRUST AGREEMENT RELATING TO SUCH DEFEASANCE AND
PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO.
(R-6)
Kenneth Henderson, Executive Director of the Development
Department, answered questions regarding the estimated costs to
defease the Bonds, and the amount of funds that would become
available for use by the City.
Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by
Council Member Minor, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 92-88 was
Ayes: Council Members Reilly,
Ludlam. Nays: None. Absent:
adopted by the following vote:
Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-
Council Members Estrada, Miller.
RECESS MEETING
At 12:04 p.m., the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common
Council recessed to the luncheon workshop in the Management
Information Center (MIC) Room, Sixth Floor, City Hall, to discuss
the Capital Improvement Program.
RECONVENE MEETING - LUNCHEON WORKSHOP
At 12:33 p.m., Mayor Holcomb called the luncheon workshop to
order in the Management Information Center (MIC), Sixth Floor,
City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken with the following being present: Mayor
Holcomb; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor,
Pope-Ludlam, Miller; Barbara Skropos, Dep~ty City Attorney, City
Clerk Krasney, City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Member
Estrada.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(39)
In a memorandum dated January 6, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, reported that the basic
purpose of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is to provide a
generally agreed upon course of action for meeting anticipated
future capital improvement needs of the community. Since there
are more needs than available funds, priorities must be
24
3/2/92
established and the projects programmed in accordance with
identified sources of funding. The Capital Improvement Program
proposed for 1991/92 to 1995/96 represents the expenditure of
$91,684,038. Projects are grouped in the following categories:
1. General BUildings
2. Street & Street Lighting
3. Sewers
4. Storm Drains
5. Traffic Controls
6. Parks and Recreation
7. Recreational Field Lighting
Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/City Engineer,
gave an overview of the booklet entitled "Proposed Capital
Improvement Program 1991-92 to 1995-96" for the City of San
Bernardino.
COUNCIL MEMBER POPE-LUDLAM EXCUSED
At 1:26 p.m., Council Member Pope-Ludlam left the luncheon
workshop.
COUNCIL MEMBER MILLER EXCUSED
At 1:28 p.m., Council Member Miller left the luncheon
workshop.
COUNCIL MEMBER
At 1:38 p.m.,
workshop.
MAUDSLEY EXCUSED
Council Member Maudsley left
the
luncheon
COUNCIL MEMBER MINOR EXCUSED
At 1:39 p.m., Council Member Minor left the luncheon
workshop.
No action was taken during the luncheon workshop.
RECESS MEETING
At 1:39 p.m., the luncheon workshop recessed to 2:00 p.m.,
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San
Bernardino, California.
RECONVENE MEETING
At 2: 02 p. m., Mayor Holcomb reconvened the regular meeting
of the Mayor and Common Council in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken with the following being present: Mayor
Holcomb; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Minor,
Pope-Ludlam; Deputy City Attorney Empeno; City Clerk Krasney,
City Administrator Clark. Absent: Council Members Estrada,
Miller.
25
3/2/92
APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 91-39 - CONSTRUCT/REMOVE A BILLBOARD TO
FACILITATE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RETAIL CENTER-
GANNETT OUTDOOR CO., INC. - CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 17,
1992 (40)
This is the time and place continued to for an appeal of the
Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-39,
a request to construct a billboard on the same site that a
billboard was removed to facilitate the construction of a retail
center. The subject property is located on the west side of the
700 South block of "E" Street, across from the Orange Show
Fairgrounds.
In a memorandum dated February 24, 1992, Al Boughey,
Director of Planning and Building Services, stated that the
applicant, Gannett Outdoor Co., Inc., is appealing the denial of
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-39, by the Planning Commission.
The applicant requests that the Mayor and Common Council approve
a conditional use permit to construct a billboard on the same
site that a billboard was removed to facilitate the construction
of a retail commercial center.
Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services,
requested that this item be continued for thirty days to give
staff an opportunity to meet with representatives of Gannett
Outdoor Co., Inc. and the City Attorney's Office.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly and unanimously carried, that the appeal regarding
Conditional Use Permit No. 91-39, be continued to 2:00 p.m.,
April 6, 1992, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North
"D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
APPEAL - PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 91-28 AND VARIANCE NO. 91-08 - OFF-SITE
SALE OF BEER AND WINE 1255 W. BASELINE STREET-
KENZIE WOOTEN - CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 3, 1992 (41)
This is the time and place continued for an appeal of the
Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 91-28
and Variance No. 91-08, requesting approval to permit the sale
of beer and wine for off-site consumption, a variance permitting
a convenience store to be constructed on less than the minimum
lot size, and permit a reduction in loading space requirements.
The applicant is Kenzie L. Wooten.
In a memorandum dated February 15, 1992, Al Boughey,
Director of Planning & Building Services, recommended that the
Mayor and Council deny the appeal, and deny Conditional Use
Permit No. 91-28 and Variance No. 91-08, based on the findings of
26
3/2/92
fact contained in the staff report dated November 6, 1991; that
the distance standards for convenience stores not be amended and
the Variance section not be amended to include reductions to the
distance requirements for convenience stores.
Mayor Holcomb opened the hearing.
Larry Reed, Assistant Director, Planning and Building
Services, gave background information relative to the appeal. At
the Council meeting of January 21, 1992, the appeal was
continued to allow the City Attorney time to research the matter
and come back with a written legal opinion providing options for
the Council.
Henry Empeno, Deputy City Attorney, stated that Legal
Opinion No. 92-05, regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 91-28 and
Variance No. 91-08 for 1255 W. Baseline has been completed'. Mr
Empeno analyzed the facts regarding the applicant, and read the
following conclusion outlining options for the Mayor and Council
to consider:
1. The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and deny CUP
91-28 and Variance 91-08; or
2. The Mayor and Council may continue the hearing and
direct staff to process an amendment to the Development
Code, to revise the distance criteria for convenience
stores and for establishment with off-site sales of
alcoholic beverages.
Mr. Empeno stated that these options are
proximity of the site to an existing residence,
other outlets for alcoholic beverages.
based on
church,
the
and
Kenzie Wooten, 1588 Western Avenue, San Bernardino, CA,
stated that the Planning Department's report contained misleading
information. He referred to page two of the opinion which
addressed the matter of the three checks submitted in 1990 for
processing fees for Review of Plans 91-13.
Mr. Wooten explained the circumstances which delayed the
processing of his application and the opposition he encountered
in dealing with the Planning Department. He pointed out that he
had submitted his application to the City two years prior to the
adoption of the new Development Code.
Mr. Wooten read into the record a letter dated February 27,
1992 addressed to Deputy City Attorney Empeno ". .pursuant to
our recent telephone conversation regarding the above case we
are enclosing herewith the information we have to support our
contention this case should not be required to proceed under the
newly adopted Development Code of June 3, 1991. It should be
27
3/2/92
grandfathered to proceed with processing under the old
development code prior to June 3, 1991. As you may recall from
our conversation, the difficulty arose whepa check was presented
to the Planning Department on a bank account that had been
closed. Our designer was not aware, of this. All company
accounts had been moved to a bank in San Bernardino. . .".
Mayor Holcomb requested legal clarification relative to this
project and whether or not the project could be grandfathered
under the old Development Code standards.
Deputy City Attorney Empeno stated that pursuant to the
legal research and factual research, he has taken into
consideration the letter from Mr. Wooten's consultant dated
February 27, 1992, and these facts do not change the facts,
analysis, or conclusion of the legal opinion. Mr. Empeno stated
that by law the Council cannot grant a conditional use permit or
variance, unless the Development Code is amended.
Deputy City Attorney Empeno stated that when the
Development Code was adopted, the Council discussed how to handle
applications that were in the process, and whether the
Development Code would have an impact on those applications
which are deemed complete or grandfather those applications which
have just been submitted. The Council ruled that applications
submitted prior to June 3, 1991, the effective date of the
Development Code, be deemed complete. Mr. Empeno stated that Mr.
Wooten's application was not deemed complete until August 9,
1991.
Mayor Holcomb stated that the only option available to Mr.
Wooten would be for the City to amend the Development Code to
provide that applications that are in the process, although not
deemed complete, be grandfathered under the old development
standards.
Mr. Empeno agreed that the only relief for Mr. Wooten would
be to amend the Development Code.
Mayor Holcomb suggested a motion to amend the Development
Code to allow for the processing of applications that were in the
pipeline although not deemed complete.
Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by
Council Member Hernandez, to direct staff to start the amendment
process to permit applications in the pipeline, prior to when the
Development Code became effective, to be looked upon as being
grandfathered. *Note: No vote was taken at this time.
Deputy
applications
Wooten's.
City Attorney Empeno pointed out that other
have been considered with problems similar to Mr.
28
3/2/92
PERSONNEL ACTIONS - DISCUSSED EARLIER IN THE MEETING.
SEE PAGE 11 (13)
This is the time and place continued to consider the
personnel actions. After a review of the personnel action list,
it was determined that line item 15 was a duplicate and should be
deleted.
Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Reilly, and unanimously carried, that the personnel
actions submitted by the Chief Examiner, dated February 21, 1992,
in accordance with all administrative regulations of the City of
San Bernardino, be approved except for line Item 15, regarding
the promotion for Tony Page, Fire Department.
CHANGE ORDER NO. TWO
STREET LIGHTS - WATERMAN
- STEINY & COMPANY, INC.
INSTALLATION OF
AVENUE FROM 2ND TO
ADDITIONAL
9TH STREETS
(S-2)
In a memorandum dated February 26, 1992, Roger G. Hardgrave,
Director of Public Works/City Engineer, stated that paxin
Electric failed to perform on the original contract to install
street lights on Waterman Avenue, from Second Street to Ninth
Street. The bonding company therefore arranged to have the work
done by Steiny & Company, Inc. Steiny & Company has quoted a
price of $18,893.59. Staff recommended that Change Order No.
Two to the contract with Steiny & Company, Inc. be approved, to
incorporate the installation of the nine additional street
lights.
Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by
Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that the transfer
of $18,900 from Account No. 129-309-57837, "Widen Tippecanoe
Avenue (east side), from I-10 to Hardt Street," to Account No.
129-309-57281, "Installation of nine street lights on Waterman
Avenue," be approved.
Council Member Pope-Ludlam made a motion, seconded by
Council Member Minor, and unanimously carried, that Change Order
No. Two to the contract with Steiny & Company, Inc., for
installation of street lights on Waterman Avenue, from 2nd to 9th
Street, in accordance with plan No. 8201, be approved, to
authorize the installation of nine additional street lights, for
an increase in the contract price of $18,893.59, from $62,406.00
to $81,299.59.
30
3/2/92
-_._---._--_._--_.._-,--,_.~-,---
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY EMPENO EXCUSED
Deputy City Attorney Empeno left the Council meeting and was
replaced by City Attorney Penman.
-
City Attorney Penman explained the difficulty encountered
with the checks submitted to pay the application processing fees.
He pointed out that the original application did not include the
sale of liquor.
Mayor Holcomb suggested that legislation be changed in such
a way that it does not open a pandora's box, but only applies to
situations similar to Mr. Wooten's case.
City Attorney Penman urged the Council to consider the
ramifications of such a motion.
Ruben Lopez, 631 W. 16th Street, San Bernardino, Ca., spoke
in opposition to the project. He stated that Planning staff
diligently carried out their duties in handling this matter. Mr.
Lopez expressed concern that the City is not enforcing the
standards imposed by the Development Code and objected to Mr.
Wooten's request to grandfather his project under the old
Development Code standards.
Carlton Deon, owner of Carlton Deon Real Estate, and owner
of property adjoining Mr. Wooten's project, expressed concern
regarding the legal aspects expressed by the City Attorney. Mr.
Deon felt that there should be no argument regarding when the
application was submitted to the City for approval as dates are
indisputable.
Council Member pope-Ludlam amended her motion, seconded by
Council Member Hernandez, to direct staff to prepare an ordinance
change to the Development COde, in the narrowest form, to apply
to situations similar to Mr. Wooten's case so that it could be
looked at on the merits of the old Development Code.
*Note: No vote was taken at this time.
Discussion ensued regarding whether or not Mr. Wooten would
have the privilege to appeal the decision of the Planning
Commission if the original application is grandfathered under the
old standards. It was pointed out that if the Planning
Commission denies the application, an appeal can be made before
the Mayor and Council.
Council Member Hernandez made a substitute motion, seconded
by Council Member Pope-Ludlam, and unanimously carried, that the
appeal be continued to March 16, 1992, in the Council Chambers of
City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
29
3/2/92
REQUEST TO WAIVE FEES AND CO-SPONSOR ST. PATRICK'S DAY
PARADE - DISCUSSED EARLIER IN THE MEETING. SEE PAGE 19
(35)
This is the time and place continued to consider a request
to waive fees and co-sponsor the St. Patrick's Day Parade as
discussed earlier in the meeting.
The Mayor and
on the Economic
consideration. .
Council requested that this matter be placed
Development Agency agenda for further
Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council
Member Pope-Ludlam that the request for waiver of fees and co-
sponsorship of the St. Patrick's Day Parade, be placed on the
Economic Development Agency agenda for the March 7, 1992 Council
meeting.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes:
Members Reilly, Hernandez, Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam. Nays:
Member Minor. Absent: Council Members Estrada, Miller.
Council
Council
RECESS MEETING
At 2:51 p.m., the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common
Council recessed until 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California for a
public hearing establishing an electrical energy fee for use of
outdoor s~orts facilities by youth sports organizations.
RECONVENE MEETING
At 7:06 p.m., Mayor Pro Tempore Reilly
regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council
Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street,
California.
reconvened the
in the Council
San Bernardino,
ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken with the following being present:
Mayor Pro Tempore Reilly; Council Members Reilly, Hernandez,
Maudsley, Pope-Ludlam; City Attorney Penman; City Clerk Krasney;
City Administrator Clark. Absent: Mayor Holcomb; Council Members
Estrada, Minor, Miller.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Phil Arvizo,
Assistant to the Council.
Executive
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The pledge of allegiance
Consoie, Jason Rhodes, and Ricky
was led
Hinkle.
by
Sean
Caras,
David
31
3/2/92
PUBLIC HEARING - ESTABLISHING AN ELECTRICAL ENERGY FEE
- USE OF OUTDOOR SPORTS FACILITIES BY YOUTH SPORTS
ORGANIZATIONS (32)
This is the time and place set for
establishing an electrical energy fee for use
facilities by youth sports organizations.
a public hearing
of outdoor sports
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 91-35 MODIFYING FEES FOR USE OF
BUILDINGS, SPORTS FACILITIES, PARK AND RECREATION
FACILITIES, ALCOHOL USE PERMITS, PARKS AND PARKING
LOTS, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES AND STURGES AUDITORIUM, BY
ESTABLISHING ELECTRICAL ENERGY FEES FOR YOUTH SPORTS
ORGANIZATIONS AND ESTABLISHING 50% OF THE CURRENT RATE
FOR USE OF PARK AND RECREATION FACILITIES BY SAN
BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT. (32)
Mayor Pro Tempore Reilly opened the hearing.
John Kramer, Superintendent of Recreation, stated that the
energy electrical fees were submitted to the Council in an
attempt to respond to the budget shortfall. The objective of the
budget reduction proposes to charge an energy fee to all youth
sports organizations currently exempt by the fee resolution.
The anticipated annual savings would be $51,600.
The proposed energy fees are $4.50 per hour for use of the
small fields; and $5.50 per hour for use of the large fields. The
maximum estimated cost that a little league would incur for use
of a small field would be $1,404; and the maximum estimated
costs for use of a senior little league field would be $2,088.
The resolution further proposed that youth organizations project
their schedules on a once-a-month basis.
John 0' Grady, District Administrator, Little League
Baseball, District 43, suggested conservation measures to reduce
the energy electrical costs for little league teams. He pointed
out that little league teams could conduct their practice games
during the day; make certain that all lights at the ball fields
are turned off; and establish curfew hours for all ballfield
lights.
John Kramer answered questions regarding the number
sports organizations that would be affected by the
energy fees.
City Administrator Clark proposed that implementation of the
proposed fees be suspended until July 1, 1992, for the purpose of
evaluating the conservation efforts suggested by the little
leagues. She stated that the resolution could be brought back
of youth
proposed
32
3/2/92
July 1, 1992 with alternatives which could include: the sharing
of fees with other youth sports teams; the City could identify
another source of funds to finance the energy costs; or the City
could request the Police Department to fund a DARE Officer
position utilizing asset forfeiture funds then the City could use
the General Fund money to pay the youth sports energy fees.
Ms. Clark answered questions regarding any future utility
increases between now and the first of July 1992 that would
affect the proposed energy fees listed in the proposed
resolution.
Dave Harp, Assistant District Administrator, District No.
43, urged the Council to forego charging the leagues for use of
the ballfield lights for this season. He proposed that all youth
sports teams have tryouts during the weekends instead of during
the week, thus producing a reduction in energy costs to the City.
At the end of the little league season, a review of the energy
costs can be made to determine energy costs that would be
charged to each team.
Joe Baca, a business owner in the City of San Bernardino,
urged the Council to waive the proposed energy fees this year.
He spoke in support of the little league youth organization's
many contributions to youth, and encouraged all citizens to take
preventative measures and invest in the youth and support youth
sports.
Carl Stratton, President of Newmark Little League, spoke of
the leagues' efforts in teaching the youth responsibility, and
how to become productive citizens. He stated little league not
only teaches youth how to play ball, but also teaches
alternatives to drug abuse, gang activity, and crime. He
suggested that the City and the little league teams work together
to identify other funding sources.
Ann Taylor, a City employee, provided statistics on the
estimated costs that a parent would have to pay if the proposed
energy fees were approved by the Council.
Council Member Maudsley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member pope-Ludlam, and unanimously carried, that the City
forego implementation of the resolution until July 1, 1992; that
the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department be
directed to report back to the Council no later than August 1,
1992 on the costs/savings for the baseball season.
Discussion ensued regarding use of the Sturges Auditorium.
It was pointed out that the resolution incorporated fees for use
of all recreational facilities.
33
3/2/92
Mr. Kramer
back relative
facilities.
suggested that a separate resolution be brought
to fees and use of park and recreational
ADJOURNMENT
(42)
At 7:46 p.m., the regular meeting of the Mayor and Common
Council adjourned to 8:30 a.m., Saturday, March 7, 1992 in the
Economic Development Agency Board Room, 201 North "E" Street, San
Bernardino, California.
RACHEL KRASNEY
City Clerk
1..7Ji4
es, Deputy City Clerk
No. of Items: 47
No. of Hours: 6 hrs.
34
3/2/92